BMPIX vs. RMQAX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

BMPIX (ProFunds Basic Materials UltraSector Fund) and RMQAX (Rydex Monthly Rebalance NASDAQ-100 2x Strategy Fund) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, BMPIX returned 10.29%/yr vs 37.61%/yr for RMQAX. A 0.57 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BMPIX charges 1.89%/yr vs 1.32%/yr for RMQAX.

Performance

BMPIX vs. RMQAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProFunds Basic Materials UltraSector Fund (BMPIX) and Rydex Monthly Rebalance NASDAQ-100 2x Strategy Fund (RMQAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BMPIX achieves a 19.15% return, which is significantly lower than RMQAX's 40.14% return. Over the past 10 years, BMPIX has underperformed RMQAX with an annualized return of 10.29%, while RMQAX has yielded a comparatively higher 37.61% annualized return.

BMPIX

• 1D: 1.71%
• 1M: 2.12%
• YTD: 19.15%
• 6M: 23.02%
• 1Y: 24.17%
• 3Y*: 11.58%
• 5Y*: 4.10%
• 10Y*: 10.29%

RMQAX

• 1D: 0.94%
• 1M: 21.45%
• YTD: 40.14%
• 6M: 35.70%
• 1Y: 83.47%
• 3Y*: 51.18%
• 5Y*: 27.34%
• 10Y*: 37.61%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BMPIX vs. RMQAX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
BMPIX ProFunds Basic Materials UltraSector Fund	19.15%	9.09%	-5.35%	15.30%	-16.22%	38.93%	18.27%	25.13%	-26.81%	34.96%
RMQAX Rydex Monthly Rebalance NASDAQ-100 2x Strategy Fund	40.14%	33.92%	44.76%	115.91%	-59.93%	56.36%	101.06%	80.80%	-7.28%	69.80%

Correlation

The correlation between BMPIX and RMQAX is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.42
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.47
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.55
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.55
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2015	0.57

The correlation between BMPIX and RMQAX shifts across timeframes, from 0.42 (1 year) to 0.57 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

BMPIX vs. RMQAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BMPIX

BMPIX Risk / Return Rank: 14
BMPIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 14
BMPIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 14
BMPIX Omega Ratio Rank: 13
BMPIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 16
BMPIX Martin Ratio Rank: 14

RMQAX

RMQAX Risk / Return Rank: 67
RMQAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 84
RMQAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 56
RMQAX Omega Ratio Rank: 56
RMQAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 76
RMQAX Martin Ratio Rank: 64

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BMPIX vs. RMQAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProFunds Basic Materials UltraSector Fund (BMPIX) and Rydex Monthly Rebalance NASDAQ-100 2x Strategy Fund (RMQAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BMPIX	RMQAX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.04	2.70	-1.66
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.56	3.16	-1.59
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.18	1.41	-0.23
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.42	3.48	-2.06
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.04	12.58	-8.54
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BMPIX vs. RMQAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BMPIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.04, which is lower than the RMQAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BMPIX and RMQAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BMPIX	RMQAX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.04	2.70	-1.66
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.14	0.60	-0.46
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.32	0.81	-0.49
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.17	0.75	-0.58

Drawdowns

BMPIX vs. RMQAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BMPIX drawdown since its inception was -84.22%, which is greater than RMQAX's maximum drawdown of -63.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BMPIX and RMQAX.

Drawdown Indicators

	BMPIX	RMQAX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-84.22%	-63.18%	-21.04%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-18.38%	-24.96%	+6.58%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-34.54%	-42.45%	+7.91%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-38.50%	-63.18%	+24.68%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-61.41%	-63.18%	+1.77%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.79%	0.00%	-6.79%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-24.12%	-12.90%	-11.22%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.45%	6.89%	-0.44%

Volatility

BMPIX vs. RMQAX - Volatility Comparison

ProFunds Basic Materials UltraSector Fund (BMPIX) and Rydex Monthly Rebalance NASDAQ-100 2x Strategy Fund (RMQAX) have volatilities of 8.89% and 8.58%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BMPIX	RMQAX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.89%	8.58%	+0.31%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	19.25%	24.32%	-5.07%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	25.13%	32.15%	-7.02%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	29.56%	46.19%	-16.63%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	32.10%	46.42%	-14.32%

BMPIX vs. RMQAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BMPIX has a 1.89% expense ratio, which is higher than RMQAX's 1.32% expense ratio.

Dividends

BMPIX vs. RMQAX - Dividend Comparison

BMPIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.52%, less than RMQAX's 25.88% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
BMPIX ProFunds Basic Materials UltraSector Fund	1.52%	1.81%	0.94%	0.96%	0.00%	0.00%	0.28%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.16%
RMQAX Rydex Monthly Rebalance NASDAQ-100 2x Strategy Fund	25.88%	36.27%	26.02%	3.76%	0.00%	2.18%	5.30%	0.10%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BMPIX and RMQAX in my portfolio?

BMPIX and RMQAX have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BMPIX or RMQAX?

BMPIX has higher volatility (8.89%) compared to RMQAX (8.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BMPIX dropped -84.22% vs RMQAX's -63.18%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RMQAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.70 vs 1.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.