BMOP vs. OVM
BMOP (BNY Mellon Municipal Opportunities ETF) and OVM (Overlay Shares Municipal Bond ETF) are both Municipal Bonds funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.56 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BMOP charges 0.54%/yr vs 0.82%/yr for OVM.
Performance
BMOP vs. OVM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
BMOP
- 1D
- 0.20%
- 1M
- 0.95%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
OVM
- 1D
- 0.24%
- 1M
- 1.20%
- YTD
- 4.20%
- 6M
- 4.67%
- 1Y
- 11.88%
- 3Y*
- 5.37%
- 5Y*
- 1.63%
- 10Y*
- —
BMOP vs. OVM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
BMOP BNY Mellon Municipal Opportunities ETF | 1.57% |
OVM Overlay Shares Municipal Bond ETF | 3.12% |
Correlation
The correlation between BMOP and OVM is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 13, 2026 | 0.56 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BMOP vs. OVM — Risk / Return Rank
BMOP
OVM
BMOP vs. OVM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNY Mellon Municipal Opportunities ETF (BMOP) and Overlay Shares Municipal Bond ETF (OVM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BMOP | OVM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.87 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.30 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.09 | 0.43 | +0.66 |
Drawdowns
BMOP vs. OVM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BMOP drawdown since its inception was -2.80%, smaller than the maximum OVM drawdown of -15.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BMOP and OVM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BMOP | OVM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.80% | -15.58% | +12.78% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -2.44% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -8.20% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -15.58% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.81% | -4.01% | +3.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.63% | — |
Volatility
BMOP vs. OVM - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BMOP | OVM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 1.27% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 3.37% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.74% | 4.16% | -0.42% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.74% | 5.39% | -1.65% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.74% | 6.54% | -2.80% |
BMOP vs. OVM - Expense Ratio Comparison
BMOP has a 0.54% expense ratio, which is lower than OVM's 0.82% expense ratio.
Dividends
BMOP vs. OVM - Dividend Comparison
BMOP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.19%, less than OVM's 6.10% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BMOP BNY Mellon Municipal Opportunities ETF | 1.19% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
OVM Overlay Shares Municipal Bond ETF | 6.10% | 5.45% | 4.91% | 4.66% | 4.21% | 6.10% | 3.97% | 0.58% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BMOP and OVM have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BMOP is cheaper at 0.54% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BMOP is cheaper with a 0.54% expense ratio, compared with 0.82% for OVM.
OVM has the higher dividend yield at 6.10%, compared with 1.19% for BMOP.
They also come from different issuers: BNY Mellon and Liquid Strategies. Their fees differ too: 0.54% for BMOP and 0.82% for OVM.
Find the right allocation for BMOP and OVM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer