PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BMOP vs. MMMA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BMOP vs. MMMA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BNY Mellon Municipal Opportunities ETF (BMOP) and NYLI MacKay Muni Allocation ETF (MMMA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


BMOP

1D
0.04%
1M
1.75%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

MMMA

1D
0.01%
1M
1.73%
YTD
3.54%
6M
3.76%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BMOP vs. MMMA - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between BMOP and MMMA is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 12, 2026

0.59

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BMOP vs. MMMA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNY Mellon Municipal Opportunities ETF (BMOP) and NYLI MacKay Muni Allocation ETF (MMMA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

BMOP vs. MMMA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BMOP vs. MMMA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BMOP drawdown since its inception was -2.80%, roughly equal to the maximum MMMA drawdown of -2.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BMOP and MMMA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BMOPMMMADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-2.80%

-2.79%

-0.01%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.73%

-0.56%

-0.17%

Volatility

BMOP vs. MMMA - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BMOPMMMADifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.64%

4.05%

-0.41%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.64%

4.05%

-0.41%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.64%

4.05%

-0.41%

BMOP vs. MMMA - Expense Ratio Comparison

BMOP has a 0.54% expense ratio, which is higher than MMMA's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

BMOP vs. MMMA - Dividend Comparison

BMOP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.19%, less than MMMA's 1.95% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


BMOP and MMMA have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, MMMA is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

MMMA is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.54% for BMOP.

MMMA has the higher dividend yield at 1.95%, compared with 1.19% for BMOP.

They also come from different issuers: BNY Mellon and NYLI. Their fees differ too: 0.54% for BMOP and 0.35% for MMMA.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BMOP and MMMA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer