PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BMOP vs. FMUN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BMOP vs. FMUN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BNY Mellon Municipal Opportunities ETF (BMOP) and Fidelity Systematic Municipal Bond Index ETF (FMUN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


BMOP

1D
-0.07%
1M
0.84%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

FMUN

1D
0.03%
1M
0.93%
YTD
1.69%
6M
2.24%
1Y
7.61%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BMOP vs. FMUN - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between BMOP and FMUN is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 13, 2026

0.62

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BMOP vs. FMUN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BMOP

FMUN
FMUN Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
FMUN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FMUN Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
FMUN Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
FMUN Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
FMUN Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BMOP vs. FMUN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNY Mellon Municipal Opportunities ETF (BMOP) and Fidelity Systematic Municipal Bond Index ETF (FMUN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

BMOP vs. FMUN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BMOPFMUNDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.45

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.96

1.28

-0.33

Drawdowns

BMOP vs. FMUN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BMOP drawdown since its inception was -2.80%, smaller than the maximum FMUN drawdown of -3.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BMOP and FMUN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BMOPFMUNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-2.80%

-3.21%

+0.41%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.21%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.09%

-0.66%

+0.57%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.82%

-0.82%

0.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.97%

Volatility

BMOP vs. FMUN - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BMOPFMUNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.27%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.27%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.75%

3.12%

+0.63%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.75%

4.06%

-0.31%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.75%

4.06%

-0.31%

BMOP vs. FMUN - Expense Ratio Comparison

BMOP has a 0.54% expense ratio, which is higher than FMUN's 0.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

BMOP vs. FMUN - Dividend Comparison

BMOP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.20%, less than FMUN's 3.29% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


BMOP and FMUN have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, FMUN is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

FMUN is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.54% for BMOP.

FMUN has the higher dividend yield at 3.29%, compared with 1.20% for BMOP.

They also come from different issuers: BNY Mellon and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.54% for BMOP and 0.05% for FMUN.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BMOP and FMUN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer