PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BMNZ vs. TSLQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BMNZ vs. TSLQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Defiance Daily Target 2X Short BMNR ETF (BMNZ) and AXS TSLA Bear Daily ETF (TSLQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BMNZ achieves a 1.13% return, which is significantly lower than TSLQ's 11.62% return.


BMNZ

1D
22.76%
1M
77.00%
YTD
1.13%
6M
35.73%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

TSLQ

1D
13.18%
1M
-1.03%
YTD
11.62%
6M
11.37%
1Y
-68.35%
3Y*
-66.15%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BMNZ vs. TSLQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
BMNZ
Defiance Daily Target 2X Short BMNR ETF
1.13%-0.49%
TSLQ
AXS TSLA Bear Daily ETF
11.62%-23.71%

Correlation

The correlation between BMNZ and TSLQ is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 14, 2025

0.38

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BMNZ vs. TSLQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BMNZ

TSLQ
TSLQ Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
TSLQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TSLQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
TSLQ Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
TSLQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
TSLQ Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BMNZ vs. TSLQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Daily Target 2X Short BMNR ETF (BMNZ) and AXS TSLA Bear Daily ETF (TSLQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

BMNZ vs. TSLQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BMNZTSLQDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.77

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.01

-0.63

+0.63

Drawdowns

BMNZ vs. TSLQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BMNZ drawdown since its inception was -70.80%, smaller than the maximum TSLQ drawdown of -98.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BMNZ and TSLQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BMNZTSLQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-70.80%

-98.73%

+27.93%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-74.03%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-97.85%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-43.38%

-98.34%

+54.96%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-51.56%

-67.25%

+15.69%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

59.96%

Volatility

BMNZ vs. TSLQ - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BMNZTSLQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

27.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

55.63%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

190.13%

93.40%

+96.73%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

190.13%

94.27%

+95.86%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

190.13%

94.27%

+95.86%

BMNZ vs. TSLQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

BMNZ has a 1.31% expense ratio, which is higher than TSLQ's 1.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

BMNZ vs. TSLQ - Dividend Comparison

BMNZ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TSLQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.46%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
BMNZ
Defiance Daily Target 2X Short BMNR ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TSLQ
AXS TSLA Bear Daily ETF
9.46%10.56%4.95%13.35%2.56%

Frequently Asked Questions


BMNZ and TSLQ have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, TSLQ is cheaper at 1.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

TSLQ is cheaper with a 1.15% expense ratio, compared with 1.31% for BMNZ.

TSLQ has the higher dividend yield at 9.46%, compared with 0.00% for BMNZ.

They also come from different issuers: Defiance and AXS. Their fees differ too: 1.31% for BMNZ and 1.15% for TSLQ.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BMNZ and TSLQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer