BMNZ vs. SOXS
BMNZ (Defiance Daily Target 2X Short BMNR ETF) and SOXS (Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bear 3x Shares) are both Inverse Equities funds - BMNZ tracks the BitMine Immersion Technologies, Inc. while SOXS tracks the PHLX Semiconductor Index (-300%). Both are passively managed. A 0.51 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BMNZ charges 1.31%/yr vs 1.08%/yr for SOXS.
Performance
BMNZ vs. SOXS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BMNZ achieves a 29.97% return, which is significantly higher than SOXS's -94.09% return.
BMNZ
- 1D
- 9.79%
- 1M
- 76.32%
- YTD
- 29.97%
- 6M
- 50.80%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SOXS
- 1D
- -11.03%
- 1M
- -41.63%
- YTD
- -94.09%
- 6M
- -93.81%
- 1Y
- -97.64%
- 3Y*
- -87.76%
- 5Y*
- -80.66%
- 10Y*
- -79.95%
BMNZ vs. SOXS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BMNZ Defiance Daily Target 2X Short BMNR ETF | 29.97% | 15.30% |
SOXS Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bear 3x Shares | -94.09% | -8.86% |
Correlation
The correlation between BMNZ and SOXS is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 13, 2025 | 0.51 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BMNZ vs. SOXS — Risk / Return Rank
BMNZ
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
SOXS
BMNZ vs. SOXS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Daily Target 2X Short BMNR ETF (BMNZ) and Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bear 3x Shares (SOXS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BMNZ | SOXS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 0.64 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | -1.00 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | -1.51 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BMNZ vs. SOXS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BMNZ drawdown since its inception was -70.80%, smaller than the maximum SOXS drawdown of -100.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BMNZ and SOXS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BMNZ | SOXS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -70.80% | -100.00% | +29.20% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -97.88% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -99.87% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -99.98% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -100.00% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -27.23% | -100.00% | +72.77% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -50.65% | -92.61% | +41.96% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 64.48% | — |
Volatility
BMNZ vs. SOXS - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BMNZ | SOXS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 65.23% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 100.97% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 187.04% | 117.61% | +69.43% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 187.04% | 111.53% | +75.51% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 187.04% | 102.14% | +84.90% |
BMNZ vs. SOXS - Expense Ratio Comparison
BMNZ has a 1.31% expense ratio, which is higher than SOXS's 1.08% expense ratio.
Dividends
BMNZ vs. SOXS - Dividend Comparison
BMNZ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SOXS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 62.55%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BMNZ Defiance Daily Target 2X Short BMNR ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SOXS Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bear 3x Shares | 62.55% | 10.79% | 5.45% | 9.22% | 0.19% | 0.00% | 3.58% | 2.30% | 0.76% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BMNZ and SOXS have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SOXS is cheaper at 1.08% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SOXS is cheaper with a 1.08% expense ratio, compared with 1.31% for BMNZ.
SOXS has the higher dividend yield at 62.55%, compared with 0.00% for BMNZ.
BMNZ tracks BitMine Immersion Technologies, Inc., while SOXS tracks PHLX Semiconductor Index (-300%). They also come from different issuers: Defiance and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 1.31% for BMNZ and 1.08% for SOXS.
Find the right allocation for BMNZ and SOXS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer