BMNZ vs. SEF
BMNZ (Defiance Daily Target 2X Short BMNR ETF) and SEF (ProShares Short Financials) are both Inverse Equities funds - BMNZ tracks the BitMine Immersion Technologies, Inc. while SEF tracks the Dow Jones U.S. Financials Index (-100%). Both are passively managed. At a 0.27 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BMNZ charges 1.31%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for SEF.
Performance
BMNZ vs. SEF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BMNZ achieves a -13.39% return, which is significantly lower than SEF's -2.09% return.
BMNZ
- 1D
- 4.39%
- 1M
- -5.35%
- 6M
- 28.59%
- YTD
- -13.39%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SEF
- 1D
- -0.30%
- 1M
- -4.14%
- 6M
- -3.05%
- YTD
- -2.09%
- 1Y
- -5.36%
- 3Y*
- -12.03%
- 5Y*
- -7.58%
- 10Y*
- -12.30%
BMNZ vs. SEF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BMNZ Defiance Daily Target 2X Short BMNR ETF | -13.39% | 15.30% |
SEF ProShares Short Financials | -2.09% | -1.76% |
Correlation
The correlation between BMNZ and SEF is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 13, 2025 | 0.27 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BMNZ vs. SEF — Risk / Return Rank
BMNZ
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
SEF
BMNZ vs. SEF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Daily Target 2X Short BMNR ETF (BMNZ) and ProShares Short Financials (SEF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BMNZ | SEF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 0.95 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | -0.36 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | -0.95 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BMNZ vs. SEF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BMNZ drawdown since its inception was -70.80%, smaller than the maximum SEF drawdown of -96.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BMNZ and SEF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BMNZ | SEF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -70.80% | -96.51% | +25.71% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -14.82% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -39.40% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -41.62% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -73.40% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -51.51% | -96.48% | +44.97% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -49.97% | -82.78% | +32.81% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 5.65% | — |
Volatility
BMNZ vs. SEF - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BMNZ | SEF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 4.21% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 11.14% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 184.15% | 14.52% | +169.63% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 184.15% | 17.97% | +166.18% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 184.15% | 20.44% | +163.71% |
BMNZ vs. SEF - Expense Ratio Comparison
BMNZ has a 1.31% expense ratio, which is higher than SEF's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
BMNZ vs. SEF - Dividend Comparison
BMNZ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SEF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.43%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BMNZ Defiance Daily Target 2X Short BMNR ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SEF ProShares Short Financials | 3.43% | 4.33% | 5.72% | 4.43% | 0.39% | 0.00% | 0.12% | 1.25% | 0.41% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BMNZ and SEF have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SEF is cheaper at 0.95% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SEF is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.31% for BMNZ.
SEF has the higher dividend yield at 3.43%, compared with 0.00% for BMNZ.
BMNZ tracks BitMine Immersion Technologies, Inc., while SEF tracks Dow Jones U.S. Financials Index (-100%). They also come from different issuers: Defiance and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 1.31% for BMNZ and 0.95% for SEF.
Find the right allocation for BMNZ and SEF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer