BMNZ vs. QTUM

Last updated Jun 6, 2026

BMNZ (Defiance Daily Target 2X Short BMNR ETF) and QTUM (Defiance Quantum ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BMNZ is a Inverse Equities fund tracking the BitMine Immersion Technologies, Inc., while QTUM is a Technology Equities fund tracking the BlueStar Machine Learning and Quantum Computing Index. Both are passively managed. At a correlation of -0.61, they often move in opposite directions. BMNZ charges 1.31%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for QTUM.

Performance

BMNZ vs. QTUM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Defiance Daily Target 2X Short BMNR ETF (BMNZ) and Defiance Quantum ETF (QTUM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BMNZ achieves a 1.13% return, which is significantly lower than QTUM's 39.60% return.

BMNZ

• 1D: 22.76%
• 1M: 77.00%
• YTD: 1.13%
• 6M: 35.73%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

QTUM

• 1D: -8.23%
• 1M: 6.35%
• YTD: 39.60%
• 6M: 35.74%
• 1Y: 78.64%
• 3Y*: 47.30%
• 5Y*: 26.76%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BMNZ vs. QTUM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
BMNZ Defiance Daily Target 2X Short BMNR ETF	1.13%	-0.49%
QTUM Defiance Quantum ETF	39.60%	3.13%

Correlation

The correlation between BMNZ and QTUM is -0.61, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 14, 2025	-0.61

Return for Risk

BMNZ vs. QTUM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QTUM

QTUM Risk / Return Rank: 84
QTUM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
QTUM Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
QTUM Omega Ratio Rank: 79
QTUM Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
QTUM Martin Ratio Rank: 89

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BMNZ vs. QTUM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Daily Target 2X Short BMNR ETF (BMNZ) and Defiance Quantum ETF (QTUM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BMNZ	QTUM	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	2.87	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	1.00	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.01	1.01	-1.01

Drawdowns

BMNZ vs. QTUM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BMNZ drawdown since its inception was -70.80%, which is greater than QTUM's maximum drawdown of -38.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BMNZ and QTUM.

Drawdown Indicators

	BMNZ	QTUM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-70.80%	-38.45%	-32.35%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-15.26%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-25.39%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-38.45%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-43.38%	-9.47%	-33.91%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-51.56%	-8.25%	-43.31%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	4.08%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	BMNZ	QTUM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	13.29%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	22.13%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	190.13%	27.61%	+162.52%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	190.13%	26.81%	+163.32%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	190.13%	27.32%	+162.81%

BMNZ vs. QTUM - Expense Ratio Comparison

BMNZ has a 1.31% expense ratio, which is higher than QTUM's 0.40% expense ratio.

Dividends

BMNZ vs. QTUM - Dividend Comparison

BMNZ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QTUM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.77%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
BMNZ Defiance Daily Target 2X Short BMNR ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
QTUM Defiance Quantum ETF	0.77%	1.01%	0.61%	0.81%	1.46%	0.48%	0.42%	0.61%	0.21%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BMNZ and QTUM in my portfolio?

BMNZ and QTUM have a correlation of -0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, BMNZ or QTUM?

On fees, QTUM is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, BMNZ or QTUM?

QTUM is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 1.31% for BMNZ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BMNZ or QTUM?

QTUM has the higher dividend yield at 0.77%, compared with 0.00% for BMNZ.

What is the main difference between BMNZ and QTUM?

BMNZ is categorized as Inverse Equities, while QTUM is Technology Equities. BMNZ tracks BitMine Immersion Technologies, Inc., while QTUM tracks BlueStar Machine Learning and Quantum Computing Index. Their fees differ too: 1.31% for BMNZ and 0.40% for QTUM.