PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BMNZ vs. HOOZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BMNZ vs. HOOZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Defiance Daily Target 2X Short BMNR ETF (BMNZ) and Defiance Daily Target 2X Short HOOD ETF (HOOZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BMNZ achieves a 29.97% return, which is significantly higher than HOOZ's -35.96% return.


BMNZ

1D
9.79%
1M
76.32%
YTD
29.97%
6M
50.80%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

HOOZ

1D
7.67%
1M
-49.19%
YTD
-35.96%
6M
-27.54%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BMNZ vs. HOOZ - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between BMNZ and HOOZ is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 13, 2025

0.73

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BMNZ vs. HOOZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Daily Target 2X Short BMNR ETF (BMNZ) and Defiance Daily Target 2X Short HOOD ETF (HOOZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

BMNZ vs. HOOZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BMNZ vs. HOOZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BMNZ drawdown since its inception was -70.80%, smaller than the maximum HOOZ drawdown of -77.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BMNZ and HOOZ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BMNZHOOZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-70.80%

-77.16%

+6.36%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-27.23%

-69.90%

+42.67%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-50.65%

-32.60%

-18.05%

Volatility

BMNZ vs. HOOZ - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BMNZHOOZDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

187.04%

145.07%

+41.97%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

187.04%

145.07%

+41.97%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

187.04%

145.07%

+41.97%

BMNZ vs. HOOZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both BMNZ and HOOZ have an expense ratio of 1.31%.


Dividends

BMNZ vs. HOOZ - Dividend Comparison

Neither BMNZ nor HOOZ has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


BMNZ and HOOZ have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 1.31% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

BMNZ and HOOZ have the same expense ratio: 1.31% per year.

BMNZ and HOOZ have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

BMNZ tracks BitMine Immersion Technologies, Inc., while HOOZ tracks Robinhood Markets, Inc..

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BMNZ and HOOZ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer