PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BMNZ vs. APLZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BMNZ vs. APLZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Defiance Daily Target 2X Short BMNR ETF (BMNZ) and Tradr 2X Short APLD Daily ETF (APLZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


BMNZ

1D
4.39%
1M
-5.35%
6M
28.59%
YTD
-13.39%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

APLZ

1D
17.90%
1M
171.17%
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BMNZ vs. APLZ - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between BMNZ and APLZ is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 22, 2026

0.52

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BMNZ vs. APLZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Daily Target 2X Short BMNR ETF (BMNZ) and Tradr 2X Short APLD Daily ETF (APLZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

BMNZ vs. APLZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BMNZ vs. APLZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BMNZ drawdown since its inception was -70.80%, smaller than the maximum APLZ drawdown of -91.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BMNZ and APLZ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BMNZAPLZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-70.80%

-91.78%

+20.98%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-51.51%

-77.25%

+25.74%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-49.97%

-60.59%

+10.62%

Volatility

BMNZ vs. APLZ - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BMNZAPLZDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

184.15%

213.67%

-29.52%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

184.15%

213.67%

-29.52%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

184.15%

213.67%

-29.52%

BMNZ vs. APLZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

BMNZ has a 1.31% expense ratio, which is lower than APLZ's 1.49% expense ratio.


Dividends

BMNZ vs. APLZ - Dividend Comparison

Neither BMNZ nor APLZ has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


BMNZ and APLZ have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, BMNZ is cheaper at 1.31% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

BMNZ is cheaper with a 1.31% expense ratio, compared with 1.49% for APLZ.

BMNZ and APLZ have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

BMNZ tracks BitMine Immersion Technologies, Inc., while APLZ tracks Applied Digital Corporation (APLD). They also come from different issuers: Defiance and Tradr. Their fees differ too: 1.31% for BMNZ and 1.49% for APLZ.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BMNZ and APLZ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer