PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BMNG vs. NTSD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BMNG vs. NTSD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 2X Long BMNR Daily ETF (BMNG) and WisdomTree Efficient U.S. Plus International Equity Fund (NTSD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


BMNG

1D
-12.21%
1M
-48.30%
YTD
-75.13%
6M
-85.16%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

NTSD

1D
-1.11%
1M
7.13%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BMNG vs. NTSD - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between BMNG and NTSD is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 20, 2026

0.65

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BMNG vs. NTSD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long BMNR Daily ETF (BMNG) and WisdomTree Efficient U.S. Plus International Equity Fund (NTSD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

BMNG vs. NTSD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BMNGNTSDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.52

5.08

-5.60

Drawdowns

BMNG vs. NTSD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BMNG drawdown since its inception was -95.36%, which is greater than NTSD's maximum drawdown of -5.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BMNG and NTSD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BMNGNTSDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-95.36%

-5.20%

-90.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-95.36%

-1.11%

-94.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-81.38%

-0.84%

-80.54%

Volatility

BMNG vs. NTSD - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BMNGNTSDDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

191.58%

24.28%

+167.30%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

191.58%

24.28%

+167.30%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

191.58%

24.28%

+167.30%

BMNG vs. NTSD - Expense Ratio Comparison

BMNG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than NTSD's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

BMNG vs. NTSD - Dividend Comparison

Neither BMNG nor NTSD has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


BMNG and NTSD have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, NTSD is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

NTSD is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for BMNG.

BMNG and NTSD have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for BMNG and 0.35% for NTSD.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BMNG and NTSD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer