BMNG vs. NFXS
BMNG (Leverage Shares 2X Long BMNR Daily ETF) and NFXS (Direxion Daily NFLX Bear 1X Shares) are both exchange-traded funds - BMNG is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Leverage Shares, while NFXS is a Inverse Equities fund actively managed by Direxion. Both are actively managed. Their -0.13 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. BMNG charges 0.75%/yr vs 1.03%/yr for NFXS.
Performance
BMNG vs. NFXS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BMNG achieves a -78.09% return, which is significantly lower than NFXS's 24.98% return.
BMNG
- 1D
- -9.09%
- 1M
- 32.74%
- 6M
- -71.67%
- YTD
- -78.09%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
NFXS
- 1D
- 2.11%
- 1M
- 7.73%
- 6M
- 11.04%
- YTD
- 24.98%
- 1Y
- 52.79%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -5.77%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $9.15M | $12.05M | $13.09M | |
| $587.15K | $968.11K | $646.26K |
BMNG vs. NFXS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BMNG Leverage Shares 2X Long BMNR Daily ETF | -78.09% | -80.50% |
NFXS Direxion Daily NFLX Bear 1X Shares | 24.98% | 16.14% |
Correlation
The correlation between BMNG and NFXS is -0.13, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 27, 2025 | -0.13 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BMNG vs. NFXS — Risk / Return Rank
BMNG
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
NFXS
BMNG vs. NFXS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long BMNR Daily ETF (BMNG) and Direxion Daily NFLX Bear 1X Shares (NFXS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BMNG | NFXS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.30 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.70 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 4.60 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BMNG vs. NFXS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BMNG drawdown since its inception was -97.32%, which is greater than NFXS's maximum drawdown of -50.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BMNG and NFXS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BMNG | NFXS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -97.32% | -50.37% | -46.95% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -31.31% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -95.92% | -12.34% | -83.58% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -84.08% | -30.81% | -53.27% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 11.54% | — |
Volatility
BMNG vs. NFXS - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BMNG | NFXS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 10.93% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 28.44% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 187.45% | 35.05% | +152.40% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 187.45% | 34.93% | +152.52% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 187.45% | 34.93% | +152.52% |
BMNG vs. NFXS - Expense Ratio Comparison
BMNG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than NFXS's 1.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
BMNG vs. NFXS - Dividend Comparison
BMNG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NFXS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.83%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
BMNG Leverage Shares 2X Long BMNR Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
NFXS Direxion Daily NFLX Bear 1X Shares | 2.83% | 3.53% | 0.87% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BMNG and NFXS have a correlation of -0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BMNG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BMNG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.03% for NFXS.
NFXS has the higher dividend yield at 2.83%, compared with 0.00% for BMNG.
BMNG is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while NFXS is Inverse Equities. They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for BMNG and 1.03% for NFXS.
Find the right allocation for BMNG and NFXS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer