BMNG vs. CSHP

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

BMNG (Leverage Shares 2X Long BMNR Daily ETF) and CSHP (iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BMNG is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Leverage Shares, while CSHP is a Ultrashort Bond fund actively managed by iShares. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.05, they often move in opposite directions. BMNG charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for CSHP.

Performance

BMNG vs. CSHP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 2X Long BMNR Daily ETF (BMNG) and iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF (CSHP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BMNG achieves a -81.21% return, which is significantly lower than CSHP's 1.83% return.

BMNG

• 1D: -9.13%
• 1M: -40.34%
• YTD: -81.21%
• 6M: -84.56%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CSHP

• 1D: -0.03%
• 1M: 0.27%
• YTD: 1.83%
• 6M: 1.92%
• 1Y: 3.94%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BMNG vs. CSHP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
BMNG Leverage Shares 2X Long BMNR Daily ETF	-81.21%	-80.50%
CSHP iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF	1.83%	0.74%

Correlation

The correlation between BMNG and CSHP is -0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 27, 2025	-0.05

Return for Risk

BMNG vs. CSHP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BMNG

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

CSHP

CSHP Risk / Return Rank: 99
CSHP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100
CSHP Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
CSHP Omega Ratio Rank: 99
CSHP Calmar Ratio Rank: 100
CSHP Martin Ratio Rank: 100

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BMNG vs. CSHP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long BMNR Daily ETF (BMNG) and iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF (CSHP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BMNG	CSHP	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	11.09	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	27.60	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	6.46	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	65.45	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	381.67	—

Drawdowns

BMNG vs. CSHP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BMNG drawdown since its inception was -96.50%, which is greater than CSHP's maximum drawdown of -0.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BMNG and CSHP.

Drawdown Indicators

	BMNG	CSHP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-96.50%	-0.08%	-96.42%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-0.06%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-96.50%	-0.04%	-96.46%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-82.04%	-0.00%	-82.04%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	0.01%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	BMNG	CSHP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	0.16%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	0.27%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	189.32%	0.36%	+188.96%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	189.32%	0.41%	+188.91%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	189.32%	0.41%	+188.91%

BMNG vs. CSHP - Expense Ratio Comparison

BMNG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than CSHP's 0.20% expense ratio.

Dividends

BMNG vs. CSHP - Dividend Comparison

BMNG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CSHP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.91%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
BMNG Leverage Shares 2X Long BMNR Daily ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
CSHP iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF	3.91%	5.39%	1.96%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BMNG and CSHP in my portfolio?

BMNG and CSHP have a correlation of -0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, BMNG or CSHP?

On fees, CSHP is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, BMNG or CSHP?

CSHP is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for BMNG.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BMNG or CSHP?

CSHP has the higher dividend yield at 3.91%, compared with 0.00% for BMNG.

What is the main difference between BMNG and CSHP?

BMNG is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while CSHP is Ultrashort Bond. They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for BMNG and 0.20% for CSHP.