BMNG vs. CCUP
BMNG (Leverage Shares 2X Long BMNR Daily ETF) and CCUP (T-REX 2X Long CRCL Daily Target ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BMNG charges 0.75%/yr vs 1.50%/yr for CCUP.
Performance
BMNG vs. CCUP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BMNG achieves a -82.31% return, which is significantly lower than CCUP's -62.44% return.
BMNG
- 1D
- 3.88%
- 1M
- -18.49%
- 6M
- -85.04%
- YTD
- -82.31%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CCUP
- 1D
- 9.40%
- 1M
- -34.01%
- 6M
- -65.47%
- YTD
- -62.44%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BMNG vs. CCUP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BMNG Leverage Shares 2X Long BMNR Daily ETF | -82.31% | -80.50% |
CCUP T-REX 2X Long CRCL Daily Target ETF | -62.44% | -73.76% |
Correlation
The correlation between BMNG and CCUP is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 27, 2025 | 0.69 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BMNG vs. CCUP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long BMNR Daily ETF (BMNG) and T-REX 2X Long CRCL Daily Target ETF (CCUP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BMNG vs. CCUP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BMNG drawdown since its inception was -97.32%, roughly equal to the maximum CCUP drawdown of -94.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BMNG and CCUP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BMNG | CCUP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -97.32% | -94.44% | -2.88% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -96.70% | -93.81% | -2.89% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -83.05% | -71.31% | -11.74% |
Volatility
BMNG vs. CCUP - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BMNG | CCUP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 186.37% | 195.24% | -8.87% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 186.37% | 195.24% | -8.87% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 186.37% | 195.24% | -8.87% |
BMNG vs. CCUP - Expense Ratio Comparison
BMNG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than CCUP's 1.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
BMNG vs. CCUP - Dividend Comparison
Neither BMNG nor CCUP has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
BMNG and CCUP have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BMNG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BMNG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for CCUP.
BMNG and CCUP have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and T-Rex. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for BMNG and 1.50% for CCUP.
Find the right allocation for BMNG and CCUP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer