PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BMNG vs. AALG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BMNG vs. AALG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 2X Long BMNR Daily ETF (BMNG) and Leverage Shares 2X Long AAL Daily ETF (AALG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BMNG achieves a -75.13% return, which is significantly lower than AALG's -32.60% return.


BMNG

1D
-12.21%
1M
-48.30%
YTD
-75.13%
6M
-85.16%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

AALG

1D
-4.84%
1M
28.23%
YTD
-32.60%
6M
-26.54%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BMNG vs. AALG - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between BMNG and AALG is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 28, 2025

0.30

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BMNG vs. AALG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long BMNR Daily ETF (BMNG) and Leverage Shares 2X Long AAL Daily ETF (AALG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

BMNG vs. AALG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BMNGAALGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.52

-0.11

-0.41

Drawdowns

BMNG vs. AALG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BMNG drawdown since its inception was -95.36%, which is greater than AALG's maximum drawdown of -64.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BMNG and AALG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BMNGAALGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-95.36%

-64.19%

-31.17%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-95.36%

-40.39%

-54.97%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-81.38%

-25.40%

-55.98%

Volatility

BMNG vs. AALG - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BMNGAALGDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

191.58%

95.00%

+96.58%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

191.58%

95.00%

+96.58%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

191.58%

95.00%

+96.58%

BMNG vs. AALG - Expense Ratio Comparison

BMNG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than AALG's 0.78% expense ratio.


Dividends

BMNG vs. AALG - Dividend Comparison

BMNG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AALG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.31%.


Frequently Asked Questions


BMNG and AALG have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, BMNG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

BMNG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.78% for AALG.

AALG has the higher dividend yield at 2.31%, compared with 0.00% for BMNG.

Their fees differ too: 0.75% for BMNG and 0.78% for AALG.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BMNG and AALG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer