BMN vs. ASFYX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

BMN (Blackrock 2037 Municipal Target Term Trust) and ASFYX (AlphaSimplex Managed Futures Strategy Fund Class Y) are both mutual funds - BMN is a Municipal Bonds fund actively managed by BlackRock, while ASFYX is a Systematic Trend fund managed by BlackRock. Over the past 3 years, BMN returned 5.93%/yr vs -1.44%/yr for ASFYX. At a correlation of -0.01, they often move in opposite directions. BMN charges 0.93%/yr vs 1.47%/yr for ASFYX.

Performance

BMN vs. ASFYX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Blackrock 2037 Municipal Target Term Trust (BMN) and AlphaSimplex Managed Futures Strategy Fund Class Y (ASFYX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BMN achieves a 0.83% return, which is significantly lower than ASFYX's 15.25% return.

BMN

• 1D: 0.39%
• 1M: 2.78%
• YTD: 0.83%
• 6M: 5.25%
• 1Y: 12.14%
• 3Y*: 5.93%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

ASFYX

• 1D: 0.56%
• 1M: 1.71%
• YTD: 15.25%
• 6M: 17.77%
• 1Y: 26.49%
• 3Y*: -1.44%
• 5Y*: 3.02%
• 10Y*: 2.97%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BMN vs. ASFYX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
BMN Blackrock 2037 Municipal Target Term Trust	0.83%	7.05%	12.65%	1.89%	-2.55%
ASFYX AlphaSimplex Managed Futures Strategy Fund Class Y	15.25%	-9.67%	-3.22%	-10.33%	-6.17%

Correlation

The correlation between BMN and ASFYX is 0.00, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.00
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	-0.02
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 28, 2022	-0.01

Return for Risk

BMN vs. ASFYX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BMN

BMN Risk / Return Rank: 14
BMN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 12
BMN Sortino Ratio Rank: 13
BMN Omega Ratio Rank: 12
BMN Calmar Ratio Rank: 17
BMN Martin Ratio Rank: 16

ASFYX

ASFYX Risk / Return Rank: 67
ASFYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 56
ASFYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 48
ASFYX Omega Ratio Rank: 51
ASFYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
ASFYX Martin Ratio Rank: 89

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BMN vs. ASFYX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Blackrock 2037 Municipal Target Term Trust (BMN) and AlphaSimplex Managed Futures Strategy Fund Class Y (ASFYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BMN	ASFYX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.95	2.20	-1.25
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.50	2.93	-1.43
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.18	1.39	-0.21
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.49	4.95	-3.46
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.40	17.88	-13.48
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BMN vs. ASFYX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BMN Sharpe Ratio is 0.95, which is lower than the ASFYX Sharpe Ratio of 2.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BMN and ASFYX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BMN	ASFYX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.95	2.20	-1.25
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.22	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.23	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.51	0.35	+0.16

Drawdowns

BMN vs. ASFYX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BMN drawdown since its inception was -13.04%, smaller than the maximum ASFYX drawdown of -36.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BMN and ASFYX.

Drawdown Indicators

	BMN	ASFYX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-13.04%	-36.43%	+23.39%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.18%	-5.24%	-2.94%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-12.92%	-30.32%	+17.40%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-36.43%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-36.43%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.79%	-18.22%	+13.43%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.32%	-13.18%	+10.86%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.76%	1.45%	+1.31%

Volatility

BMN vs. ASFYX - Volatility Comparison

Blackrock 2037 Municipal Target Term Trust (BMN) and AlphaSimplex Managed Futures Strategy Fund Class Y (ASFYX) have volatilities of 3.50% and 3.67%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BMN	ASFYX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.50%	3.67%	-0.17%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.58%	9.54%	+1.04%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.86%	11.77%	+1.09%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	10.69%	13.77%	-3.08%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	10.69%	12.71%	-2.02%

BMN vs. ASFYX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BMN has a 0.93% expense ratio, which is lower than ASFYX's 1.47% expense ratio.

Dividends

BMN vs. ASFYX - Dividend Comparison

BMN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.34%, more than ASFYX's 1.32% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ASFYX AlphaSimplex Managed Futures Strategy Fund Class Y	1.32%	1.52%	1.46%	0.99%	32.48%	6.07%	3.40%	5.51%	1.30%	0.07%	0.01%	5.06%
BMN Blackrock 2037 Municipal Target Term Trust	4.34%	4.30%	4.40%	4.74%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BMN and ASFYX in my portfolio?

BMN and ASFYX have a correlation of 0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BMN or ASFYX?

ASFYX has higher volatility (3.67%) compared to BMN (3.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BMN dropped -13.04% vs ASFYX's -36.43%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ASFYX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.20 vs 0.95), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.