PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BMEAX vs. TCBIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BMEAX vs. TCBIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BlackRock High Equity Income Fund Class A (BMEAX) and The Covered Bridge Fund (TCBIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BMEAX achieves a 7.08% return, which is significantly lower than TCBIX's 10.93% return. Over the past 10 years, BMEAX has outperformed TCBIX with an annualized return of 8.82%, while TCBIX has yielded a comparatively lower 7.93% annualized return.


BMEAX

1D
-0.11%
1M
2.17%
YTD
7.08%
6M
9.73%
1Y
21.45%
3Y*
12.37%
5Y*
7.36%
10Y*
8.82%

TCBIX

1D
0.10%
1M
2.62%
YTD
10.93%
6M
11.87%
1Y
22.84%
3Y*
11.46%
5Y*
6.53%
10Y*
7.93%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BMEAX vs. TCBIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BMEAX
BlackRock High Equity Income Fund Class A
7.08%16.81%6.18%8.54%-3.59%22.11%-1.75%21.68%-6.50%15.85%
TCBIX
The Covered Bridge Fund
10.93%12.61%4.09%4.09%0.05%18.21%-1.71%18.73%-3.93%9.66%

Correlation

The correlation between BMEAX and TCBIX is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.82

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.86

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.89

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 4, 2013

0.87

The correlation between BMEAX and TCBIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BMEAX vs. TCBIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BMEAX
BMEAX Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
BMEAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BMEAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
BMEAX Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
BMEAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
BMEAX Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank

TCBIX
TCBIX Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
TCBIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TCBIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
TCBIX Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
TCBIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
TCBIX Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BMEAX vs. TCBIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock High Equity Income Fund Class A (BMEAX) and The Covered Bridge Fund (TCBIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BMEAXTCBIXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.97

2.69

-0.72

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.89

4.05

-1.17

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.49

-0.13

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.29

4.40

-2.10

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

9.79

15.19

-5.40

BMEAX vs. TCBIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BMEAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.97, which is comparable to the TCBIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BMEAX and TCBIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BMEAXTCBIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.97

2.69

-0.72

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.55

0.54

+0.01

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.56

0.59

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.55

0.56

-0.01

Drawdowns

BMEAX vs. TCBIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BMEAX drawdown since its inception was -73.05%, which is greater than TCBIX's maximum drawdown of -28.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BMEAX and TCBIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BMEAXTCBIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-73.05%

-28.94%

-44.11%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.56%

-5.26%

-4.30%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.79%

-12.73%

-1.06%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.32%

-17.07%

-2.25%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.27%

-28.94%

-9.33%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.11%

0.00%

-0.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.68%

-3.48%

-16.20%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.24%

1.52%

+0.72%

Volatility

BMEAX vs. TCBIX - Volatility Comparison

BlackRock High Equity Income Fund Class A (BMEAX) has a higher volatility of 2.77% compared to The Covered Bridge Fund (TCBIX) at 2.29%. This indicates that BMEAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TCBIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BMEAXTCBIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.77%

2.29%

+0.48%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.42%

5.92%

+2.50%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.79%

8.66%

+2.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.42%

12.16%

+1.26%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.74%

13.55%

+2.19%

BMEAX vs. TCBIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BMEAX has a 1.10% expense ratio, which is lower than TCBIX's 1.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

BMEAX vs. TCBIX - Dividend Comparison

BMEAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.52%, less than TCBIX's 7.98% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BMEAX
BlackRock High Equity Income Fund Class A
7.52%7.62%6.10%5.45%5.70%6.46%4.52%4.46%10.86%58.18%6.05%8.93%
TCBIX
The Covered Bridge Fund
7.98%8.24%7.47%7.34%8.09%6.00%4.70%6.77%11.55%7.32%7.32%5.36%

Frequently Asked Questions


BMEAX and TCBIX have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BMEAX has higher volatility (2.77%) compared to TCBIX (2.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BMEAX dropped -73.05% vs TCBIX's -28.94%.

TCBIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.69 vs 1.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BMEAX and TCBIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer