PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BMCAX vs. FOCKX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BMCAX vs. FOCKX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BlackRock Advantage Large Cap Growth Fund (BMCAX) and Fidelity OTC Portfolio Class K (FOCKX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BMCAX achieves a 14.04% return, which is significantly lower than FOCKX's 27.65% return. Over the past 10 years, BMCAX has underperformed FOCKX with an annualized return of 18.00%, while FOCKX has yielded a comparatively higher 22.74% annualized return.


BMCAX

1D
-0.03%
1M
8.98%
YTD
14.04%
6M
13.34%
1Y
36.01%
3Y*
28.28%
5Y*
16.21%
10Y*
18.00%

FOCKX

1D
0.76%
1M
10.65%
YTD
27.65%
6M
28.76%
1Y
62.04%
3Y*
34.92%
5Y*
19.63%
10Y*
22.74%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BMCAX vs. FOCKX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BMCAX
BlackRock Advantage Large Cap Growth Fund
14.04%21.40%32.28%39.38%-30.37%26.61%31.89%33.39%-2.87%22.57%
FOCKX
Fidelity OTC Portfolio Class K
27.65%22.28%38.91%42.92%-32.07%25.06%46.83%39.36%-3.18%38.78%

Correlation

The correlation between BMCAX and FOCKX is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 12, 2008

0.90

The correlation between BMCAX and FOCKX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BMCAX vs. FOCKX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BMCAX
BMCAX Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
BMCAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BMCAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
BMCAX Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
BMCAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
BMCAX Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank

FOCKX
FOCKX Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
FOCKX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FOCKX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
FOCKX Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
FOCKX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
FOCKX Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BMCAX vs. FOCKX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock Advantage Large Cap Growth Fund (BMCAX) and Fidelity OTC Portfolio Class K (FOCKX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BMCAXFOCKXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.21

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.32

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.59

-0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.53

5.61

-3.09

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.70

24.83

-16.13

BMCAX vs. FOCKX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BMCAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.35, which is lower than the FOCKX Sharpe Ratio of 3.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BMCAX and FOCKX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BMCAXFOCKXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.35

3.56

-1.21

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.76

0.87

-0.11

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.86

1.02

-0.16

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.48

0.74

-0.26

Drawdowns

BMCAX vs. FOCKX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BMCAX drawdown since its inception was -58.55%, which is greater than FOCKX's maximum drawdown of -53.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BMCAX and FOCKX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BMCAXFOCKXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.55%

-53.33%

-5.22%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.71%

-11.28%

-3.43%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.29%

-24.83%

+1.54%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.84%

-36.97%

+3.13%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.84%

-36.97%

+3.13%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.03%

0.00%

-0.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.43%

-8.38%

-1.05%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.26%

2.54%

+1.72%

Volatility

BMCAX vs. FOCKX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BlackRock Advantage Large Cap Growth Fund (BMCAX) is 3.68%, while Fidelity OTC Portfolio Class K (FOCKX) has a volatility of 5.39%. This indicates that BMCAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FOCKX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BMCAXFOCKXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.68%

5.39%

-1.71%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.92%

13.94%

-2.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.83%

17.79%

-1.96%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.38%

22.68%

-1.30%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.12%

22.46%

-1.34%

BMCAX vs. FOCKX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BMCAX has a 0.87% expense ratio, which is higher than FOCKX's 0.73% expense ratio.


Dividends

BMCAX vs. FOCKX - Dividend Comparison

BMCAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.08%, more than FOCKX's 5.92% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BMCAX
BlackRock Advantage Large Cap Growth Fund
6.08%6.94%22.50%0.79%0.19%14.39%5.68%4.12%9.77%6.04%0.56%7.42%
FOCKX
Fidelity OTC Portfolio Class K
5.92%7.56%16.42%0.09%3.97%11.34%6.18%7.49%7.81%4.85%3.25%5.42%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, BMCAX and FOCKX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FOCKX has higher volatility (5.39%) compared to BMCAX (3.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BMCAX dropped -58.55% vs FOCKX's -53.33%.

FOCKX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.56 vs 2.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BMCAX and FOCKX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer