PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BMCAX vs. CHASX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BMCAX vs. CHASX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BlackRock Advantage Large Cap Growth Fund (BMCAX) and Chase Growth Fund (CHASX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BMCAX achieves a 10.60% return, which is significantly lower than CHASX's 27.22% return. Over the past 10 years, BMCAX has underperformed CHASX with an annualized return of 17.57%, while CHASX has yielded a comparatively higher 20.11% annualized return.


BMCAX

1D
1.63%
1M
1.31%
6M
9.57%
YTD
10.60%
1Y
25.04%
3Y*
25.42%
5Y*
13.53%
10Y*
17.57%

CHASX

1D
1.41%
1M
2.55%
6M
24.46%
YTD
27.22%
1Y
46.37%
3Y*
40.78%
5Y*
21.92%
10Y*
20.11%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BMCAX vs. CHASX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BMCAX
BlackRock Advantage Large Cap Growth Fund
10.60%21.40%32.28%39.38%-30.37%26.61%31.89%33.39%-2.87%22.57%
CHASX
Chase Growth Fund
27.22%20.61%64.71%25.91%-20.41%22.32%18.27%42.63%-3.96%24.49%

Correlation

The correlation between BMCAX and CHASX is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.84

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.87

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 2, 1997

0.85

The correlation between BMCAX and CHASX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BMCAX vs. CHASX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BMCAX
BMCAX Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
BMCAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BMCAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
BMCAX Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
BMCAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
BMCAX Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank

CHASX
CHASX Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
CHASX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CHASX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
CHASX Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
CHASX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
CHASX Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BMCAX vs. CHASX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock Advantage Large Cap Growth Fund (BMCAX) and Chase Growth Fund (CHASX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BMCAXCHASXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.00

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.22

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.41

-0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.68

4.62

-2.94

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.54

18.87

-13.32

BMCAX vs. CHASX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BMCAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.45, which is lower than the CHASX Sharpe Ratio of 2.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BMCAX and CHASX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BMCAX vs. CHASX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BMCAX drawdown since its inception was -58.55%, which is greater than CHASX's maximum drawdown of -45.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BMCAX and CHASX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BMCAXCHASXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.55%

-45.94%

-12.61%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.71%

-9.90%

-4.81%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.29%

-23.40%

+0.11%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.84%

-24.63%

-9.21%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.84%

-30.40%

-3.44%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.04%

0.00%

-3.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.41%

-9.13%

-0.28%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.46%

2.42%

+2.04%

Volatility

BMCAX vs. CHASX - Volatility Comparison

BlackRock Advantage Large Cap Growth Fund (BMCAX) and Chase Growth Fund (CHASX) have volatilities of 6.45% and 6.57%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BMCAXCHASXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.45%

6.57%

-0.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.49%

14.65%

-1.16%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.03%

18.61%

-1.58%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.59%

20.45%

+1.14%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.15%

19.97%

+1.18%

BMCAX vs. CHASX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BMCAX has a 0.87% expense ratio, which is lower than CHASX's 1.14% expense ratio.


Dividends

BMCAX vs. CHASX - Dividend Comparison

BMCAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.27%, less than CHASX's 7.17% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BMCAX
BlackRock Advantage Large Cap Growth Fund
6.27%6.94%22.50%0.79%0.19%14.39%5.68%4.12%9.77%6.04%0.56%7.42%
CHASX
Chase Growth Fund
7.17%9.12%36.67%5.80%5.49%20.15%7.83%22.82%12.92%11.92%9.14%10.24%

Frequently Asked Questions


BMCAX and CHASX have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CHASX has higher volatility (6.57%) compared to BMCAX (6.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BMCAX dropped -58.55% vs CHASX's -45.94%.

CHASX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.46 vs 1.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BMCAX and CHASX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer