PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BMAX vs. BDIV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BMAX vs. BDIV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in REX Bitcoin Corporate Treasury Convertible Bond ETF (BMAX) and AAM Brentview Dividend Growth ETF (BDIV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


BMAX

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BDIV

1D
0.04%
1M
1.48%
YTD
7.27%
6M
6.86%
1Y
20.21%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BMAX vs. BDIV - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between BMAX and BDIV is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.30

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 17, 2025

0.36

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BMAX vs. BDIV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BMAX

BDIV
BDIV Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
BDIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BDIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
BDIV Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
BDIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
BDIV Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BMAX vs. BDIV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for REX Bitcoin Corporate Treasury Convertible Bond ETF (BMAX) and AAM Brentview Dividend Growth ETF (BDIV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

BMAX vs. BDIV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BMAXBDIVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.10

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.20

Drawdowns

BMAX vs. BDIV - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BMAXBDIVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.98%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.01%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.53%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.99%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.76%

Volatility

BMAX vs. BDIV - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BMAXBDIVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.35%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.22%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.69%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.41%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.41%

BMAX vs. BDIV - Expense Ratio Comparison

BMAX has a 1.14% expense ratio, which is higher than BDIV's 0.49% expense ratio.


Dividends

BMAX vs. BDIV - Dividend Comparison

BMAX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BDIV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.59%.


PositionTTM20252024
BDIV
AAM Brentview Dividend Growth ETF
1.59%1.14%0.62%
BMAX
REX Bitcoin Corporate Treasury Convertible Bond ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


BMAX and BDIV have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, BDIV is cheaper at 0.49% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

BDIV is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 1.14% for BMAX.

BDIV has the higher dividend yield at 1.59%, compared with 0.00% for BMAX.

BMAX is categorized as Convertible Bonds, while BDIV is Large Cap Value Equities. They also come from different issuers: REX and AAM. Their fees differ too: 1.14% for BMAX and 0.49% for BDIV.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BMAX and BDIV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer