BMAX.TO vs. CEQT.TO

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

BMAX.TO (Brompton Enhanced Multi-Asset Income ETF) and CEQT.TO (CI Equity Asset Allocation ETF) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. Over the past 3 years, BMAX.TO returned 18.63%/yr vs 22.17%/yr for CEQT.TO. At a 0.28 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BMAX.TO charges 2.62%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for CEQT.TO.

Performance

BMAX.TO vs. CEQT.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Brompton Enhanced Multi-Asset Income ETF (BMAX.TO) and CI Equity Asset Allocation ETF (CEQT.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BMAX.TO achieves a 9.27% return, which is significantly lower than CEQT.TO's 13.14% return.

BMAX.TO

• 1D: -0.03%
• 1M: 4.64%
• YTD: 9.27%
• 6M: 9.79%
• 1Y: 22.18%
• 3Y*: 18.63%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CEQT.TO

• 1D: 0.75%
• 1M: 6.45%
• YTD: 13.14%
• 6M: 13.90%
• 1Y: 32.12%
• 3Y*: 22.17%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BMAX.TO vs. CEQT.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
BMAX.TO Brompton Enhanced Multi-Asset Income ETF	9.27%	17.88%	19.42%	9.25%
CEQT.TO CI Equity Asset Allocation ETF	13.14%	18.84%	27.38%	6.47%

Correlation

The correlation between BMAX.TO and CEQT.TO is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.38
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.27
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 18, 2023	0.28

The correlation between BMAX.TO and CEQT.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.27 (3 years) to 0.38 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

BMAX.TO vs. CEQT.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BMAX.TO

BMAX.TO Risk / Return Rank: 59
BMAX.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 62
BMAX.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 63
BMAX.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 62
BMAX.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 48
BMAX.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 59

CEQT.TO

CEQT.TO Risk / Return Rank: 90
CEQT.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 89
CEQT.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 94
CEQT.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 98
CEQT.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 83
CEQT.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 86

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BMAX.TO vs. CEQT.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brompton Enhanced Multi-Asset Income ETF (BMAX.TO) and CI Equity Asset Allocation ETF (CEQT.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BMAX.TO	CEQT.TO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.10	3.05	-0.95
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.01	4.90	-1.90
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.38	2.03	-0.65
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.38	4.44	-2.06
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.46	17.96	-7.50
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BMAX.TO vs. CEQT.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BMAX.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.10, which is lower than the CEQT.TO Sharpe Ratio of 3.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BMAX.TO and CEQT.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BMAX.TO	CEQT.TO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.10	3.05	-0.95
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.38	1.67	-0.29

Drawdowns

BMAX.TO vs. CEQT.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BMAX.TO drawdown since its inception was -15.42%, which is greater than CEQT.TO's maximum drawdown of -14.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BMAX.TO and CEQT.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	BMAX.TO	CEQT.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-15.42%	-14.02%	-1.40%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.35%	-7.26%	-2.09%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.42%	-14.02%	-1.40%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.96%	0.00%	-0.96%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.90%	-1.19%	-0.71%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.13%	1.79%	+0.34%

Volatility

BMAX.TO vs. CEQT.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Brompton Enhanced Multi-Asset Income ETF (BMAX.TO) is 3.27%, while CI Equity Asset Allocation ETF (CEQT.TO) has a volatility of 3.70%. This indicates that BMAX.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CEQT.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BMAX.TO	CEQT.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.27%	3.70%	-0.43%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.81%	8.81%	0.00%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.62%	10.58%	+0.04%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.13%	13.11%	+0.02%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.13%	13.11%	+0.02%

BMAX.TO vs. CEQT.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

BMAX.TO has a 2.62% expense ratio, which is higher than CEQT.TO's 0.30% expense ratio.

Dividends

BMAX.TO vs. CEQT.TO - Dividend Comparison

BMAX.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.59%, more than CEQT.TO's 0.90% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
BMAX.TO Brompton Enhanced Multi-Asset Income ETF	9.59%	9.70%	9.64%	9.55%	2.41%
CEQT.TO CI Equity Asset Allocation ETF	0.90%	1.25%	1.82%	1.06%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BMAX.TO and CEQT.TO in my portfolio?

BMAX.TO and CEQT.TO have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, BMAX.TO or CEQT.TO?

On fees, CEQT.TO is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, BMAX.TO or CEQT.TO?

CEQT.TO is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 2.62% for BMAX.TO.

What is the main difference between BMAX.TO and CEQT.TO?

They also come from different issuers: Brompton Funds and CI. Their fees differ too: 2.62% for BMAX.TO and 0.30% for CEQT.TO.