BLV vs. PIT

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

BLV (Vanguard Long-Term Bond ETF) and PIT (VanEck Commodity Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BLV is a Long-Term Bond fund tracking the Bloomberg U.S. Long Government/Credit Float Adjusted Index, while PIT is a Commodities fund actively managed by VanEck. BLV is passively managed, while PIT is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, BLV returned 1.92%/yr vs 18.98%/yr for PIT. At a correlation of -0.10, they often move in opposite directions. BLV charges 0.03%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for PIT.

Performance

BLV vs. PIT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Long-Term Bond ETF (BLV) and VanEck Commodity Strategy ETF (PIT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BLV achieves a 1.00% return, which is significantly lower than PIT's 25.62% return.

BLV

• 1D: 0.19%
• 1M: 1.80%
• YTD: 1.00%
• 6M: 0.87%
• 1Y: 5.39%
• 3Y*: 1.92%
• 5Y*: -3.65%
• 10Y*: 0.93%

PIT

• 1D: -1.32%
• 1M: -11.78%
• YTD: 25.62%
• 6M: 23.58%
• 1Y: 39.64%
• 3Y*: 18.98%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BLV vs. PIT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
BLV Vanguard Long-Term Bond ETF	1.00%	6.44%	-3.65%	7.35%	-3.20%
PIT VanEck Commodity Strategy ETF	25.62%	21.63%	6.77%	-4.54%	1.67%

Correlation

The correlation between BLV and PIT is -0.27, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.27
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	-0.11
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 22, 2022	-0.10

The correlation between BLV and PIT shifts across timeframes, from -0.27 (1 year) to -0.10 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

BLV vs. PIT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BLV

BLV Risk / Return Rank: 20
BLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 20
BLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 19
BLV Omega Ratio Rank: 18
BLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 21
BLV Martin Ratio Rank: 20

PIT

PIT Risk / Return Rank: 57
PIT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
PIT Sortino Ratio Rank: 52
PIT Omega Ratio Rank: 56
PIT Calmar Ratio Rank: 56
PIT Martin Ratio Rank: 63

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BLV vs. PIT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Long-Term Bond ETF (BLV) and VanEck Commodity Strategy ETF (PIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BLV	PIT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.68	1.85	-1.17
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.03	2.40	-1.37
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.12	1.33	-0.21
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.95	2.62	-1.68
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.31	10.88	-8.58

BLV vs. PIT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BLV Sharpe Ratio is 0.68, which is lower than the PIT Sharpe Ratio of 1.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BLV and PIT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

BLV vs. PIT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BLV drawdown since its inception was -38.29%, which is greater than PIT's maximum drawdown of -15.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BLV and PIT.

Drawdown Indicators

	BLV	PIT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-38.29%	-15.19%	-23.10%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.73%	-15.19%	+9.46%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.16%	-15.19%	+0.03%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-36.27%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-38.29%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-23.60%	-15.19%	-8.41%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.55%	-4.08%	-5.47%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.34%	3.66%	-1.32%

Volatility

BLV vs. PIT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard Long-Term Bond ETF (BLV) is 1.96%, while VanEck Commodity Strategy ETF (PIT) has a volatility of 4.72%. This indicates that BLV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PIT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BLV	PIT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.96%	4.72%	-2.76%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	5.75%	19.40%	-13.65%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	7.97%	21.66%	-13.69%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.93%	17.50%	-4.57%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	11.99%	17.50%	-5.51%

BLV vs. PIT - Expense Ratio Comparison

BLV has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than PIT's 0.55% expense ratio.

Dividends

BLV vs. PIT - Dividend Comparison

BLV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.77%, less than PIT's 7.10% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BLV Vanguard Long-Term Bond ETF	4.77%	4.67%	5.09%	4.06%	4.17%	3.37%	6.12%	3.57%	4.07%	3.63%	4.16%	4.37%
PIT VanEck Commodity Strategy ETF	7.10%	8.92%	3.59%	6.44%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BLV and PIT in my portfolio?

BLV and PIT have a correlation of -0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BLV or PIT?

PIT has higher volatility (4.72%) compared to BLV (1.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BLV dropped -38.29% vs PIT's -15.19%.

Which ETF is better, BLV or PIT?

On 3-year performance, PIT leads with 18.98% vs 1.92% for BLV. On fees, BLV is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, BLV has been the lower-risk option at 1.96%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BLV or PIT?

Over the 3-year period, PIT has performed better with a 18.98% return vs 1.92%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BLV or PIT?

BLV is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for PIT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BLV or PIT?

PIT has the higher dividend yield at 7.10%, compared with 4.77% for BLV.

What is the main difference between BLV and PIT?

BLV is categorized as Long-Term Bond, while PIT is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for BLV and 0.55% for PIT.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PIT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.85 vs 0.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.