PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BLUX vs. CVSE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BLUX vs. CVSE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Bluemonte Dynamic Total Market ETF (BLUX) and Calvert US Select Equity ETF (CVSE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


BLUX

1D
-0.82%
1M
4.19%
YTD
12.94%
6M
12.67%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

CVSE

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
0.00%
6M
0.00%
1Y
8.06%
3Y*
13.34%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BLUX vs. CVSE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
BLUX
Bluemonte Dynamic Total Market ETF
12.94%11.82%
CVSE
Calvert US Select Equity ETF
0.00%7.47%

Correlation

The correlation between BLUX and CVSE is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 24, 2025

0.43

BLUX vs. CVSE - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
BLUX
CVSE

Technology

24.5%
39.5%

Financial Services

14.8%
16.3%

Healthcare

12.0%
10.3%

Industrials

11.8%
11.3%

Consumer Cyclical

10.2%
7.0%

Communication Services

6.6%
5.1%

Energy

5.1%

-

Real Estate

4.9%
3.5%

Consumer Defensive

3.9%
1.7%

Basic Materials

3.5%
2.7%

Utilities

2.8%
2.5%

Technology

BLUX
24.5%
CVSE
39.5%

Financial Services

BLUX
14.8%
CVSE
16.3%

Healthcare

BLUX
12.0%
CVSE
10.3%

Industrials

BLUX
11.8%
CVSE
11.3%

Consumer Cyclical

BLUX
10.2%
CVSE
7.0%

Communication Services

BLUX
6.6%
CVSE
5.1%

Energy

BLUX
5.1%
CVSE

-

Real Estate

BLUX
4.9%
CVSE
3.5%

Consumer Defensive

BLUX
3.9%
CVSE
1.7%

Basic Materials

BLUX
3.5%
CVSE
2.7%

Utilities

BLUX
2.8%
CVSE
2.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BLUX vs. CVSE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BLUX

CVSE
CVSE Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
CVSE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CVSE Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
CVSE Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
CVSE Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
CVSE Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BLUX vs. CVSE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bluemonte Dynamic Total Market ETF (BLUX) and Calvert US Select Equity ETF (CVSE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

BLUX vs. CVSE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BLUXCVSEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.28

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.02

0.92

+1.10

Drawdowns

BLUX vs. CVSE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BLUX drawdown since its inception was -9.03%, smaller than the maximum CVSE drawdown of -20.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BLUX and CVSE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BLUXCVSEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-9.03%

-20.29%

+11.26%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.08%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.29%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.82%

-1.68%

+0.86%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.32%

-2.69%

+1.37%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.42%

Volatility

BLUX vs. CVSE - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BLUXCVSEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.91%

6.49%

+7.42%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.91%

13.87%

+0.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.91%

13.87%

+0.04%

BLUX vs. CVSE - Expense Ratio Comparison

BLUX has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than CVSE's 0.29% expense ratio.


Dividends

BLUX vs. CVSE - Dividend Comparison

BLUX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.84%, more than CVSE's 0.59% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
BLUX
Bluemonte Dynamic Total Market ETF
0.84%0.73%0.00%0.00%
CVSE
Calvert US Select Equity ETF
0.59%0.81%1.05%1.22%

Frequently Asked Questions


BLUX and CVSE have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, BLUX is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

BLUX is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for CVSE.

BLUX has the higher dividend yield at 0.84%, compared with 0.59% for CVSE.

They also come from different issuers: Bluemonte and Calvert. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for BLUX and 0.29% for CVSE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BLUX and CVSE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer