PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BLUI vs. VGMS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BLUI vs. VGMS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Bluemonte Diversified Income ETF (BLUI) and Vanguard Multi-Sector Income Bond ETF (VGMS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BLUI achieves a 3.69% return, which is significantly higher than VGMS's 1.29% return.


BLUI

1D
0.41%
1M
0.31%
YTD
3.69%
6M
3.59%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

VGMS

1D
0.23%
1M
0.38%
YTD
1.29%
6M
1.72%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BLUI vs. VGMS - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between BLUI and VGMS is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 24, 2025

0.74

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BLUI vs. VGMS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bluemonte Diversified Income ETF (BLUI) and Vanguard Multi-Sector Income Bond ETF (VGMS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

BLUI vs. VGMS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BLUIVGMSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.07

2.18

-0.10

Drawdowns

BLUI vs. VGMS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BLUI drawdown since its inception was -2.43%, roughly equal to the maximum VGMS drawdown of -2.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BLUI and VGMS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BLUIVGMSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-2.43%

-2.46%

+0.03%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.02%

-0.16%

+0.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.36%

-0.31%

-0.05%

Volatility

BLUI vs. VGMS - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BLUIVGMSDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.90%

3.21%

+0.69%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.90%

3.21%

+0.69%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.90%

3.21%

+0.69%

BLUI vs. VGMS - Expense Ratio Comparison

BLUI has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than VGMS's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

BLUI vs. VGMS - Dividend Comparison

BLUI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.70%, less than VGMS's 5.15% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


BLUI and VGMS have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, VGMS is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VGMS is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for BLUI.

VGMS has the higher dividend yield at 5.15%, compared with 4.70% for BLUI.

They also come from different issuers: Bluemonte and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for BLUI and 0.30% for VGMS.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BLUI and VGMS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer