PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BLUI vs. SOFR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BLUI vs. SOFR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Bluemonte Diversified Income ETF (BLUI) and Amplify Samsung SOFR ETF (SOFR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BLUI achieves a 3.69% return, which is significantly higher than SOFR's 1.46% return.


BLUI

1D
0.41%
1M
0.31%
YTD
3.69%
6M
3.59%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

SOFR

1D
0.00%
1M
0.23%
YTD
1.46%
6M
1.75%
1Y
3.92%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BLUI vs. SOFR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
BLUI
Bluemonte Diversified Income ETF
3.69%3.80%
SOFR
Amplify Samsung SOFR ETF
1.46%2.19%

Correlation

The correlation between BLUI and SOFR is 0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 24, 2025

0.04

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BLUI vs. SOFR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BLUI

SOFR
SOFR Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
SOFR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SOFR Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
SOFR Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
SOFR Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
SOFR Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BLUI vs. SOFR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bluemonte Diversified Income ETF (BLUI) and Amplify Samsung SOFR ETF (SOFR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

BLUI vs. SOFR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BLUISOFRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.68

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.07

4.96

-2.88

Drawdowns

BLUI vs. SOFR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BLUI drawdown since its inception was -2.43%, which is greater than SOFR's maximum drawdown of -0.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BLUI and SOFR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BLUISOFRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-2.43%

-0.41%

-2.02%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.41%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.02%

-0.14%

+0.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.36%

-0.03%

-0.33%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.10%

Volatility

BLUI vs. SOFR - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BLUISOFRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.24%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.55%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.90%

0.84%

+3.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.90%

0.84%

+3.06%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.90%

0.84%

+3.06%

BLUI vs. SOFR - Expense Ratio Comparison

BLUI has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than SOFR's 0.20% expense ratio.


Dividends

BLUI vs. SOFR - Dividend Comparison

BLUI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.70%, more than SOFR's 3.95% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
BLUI
Bluemonte Diversified Income ETF
4.70%2.91%0.00%
SOFR
Amplify Samsung SOFR ETF
3.95%4.22%1.60%

Frequently Asked Questions


BLUI and SOFR have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SOFR is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SOFR is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for BLUI.

BLUI has the higher dividend yield at 4.70%, compared with 3.95% for SOFR.

They also come from different issuers: Bluemonte and Amplify. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for BLUI and 0.20% for SOFR.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BLUI and SOFR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer