PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BLUI vs. HFSI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BLUI vs. HFSI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Bluemonte Diversified Income ETF (BLUI) and Hartford Strategic Income ETF (HFSI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BLUI achieves a 3.69% return, which is significantly higher than HFSI's 1.55% return.


BLUI

1D
0.41%
1M
0.31%
YTD
3.69%
6M
3.59%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

HFSI

1D
0.17%
1M
0.85%
YTD
1.55%
6M
1.77%
1Y
7.98%
3Y*
8.35%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BLUI vs. HFSI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
BLUI
Bluemonte Diversified Income ETF
3.69%3.80%
HFSI
Hartford Strategic Income ETF
1.55%5.57%

Correlation

The correlation between BLUI and HFSI is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 24, 2025

0.66

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BLUI vs. HFSI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BLUI

HFSI
HFSI Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
HFSI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HFSI Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
HFSI Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
HFSI Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
HFSI Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BLUI vs. HFSI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bluemonte Diversified Income ETF (BLUI) and Hartford Strategic Income ETF (HFSI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

BLUI vs. HFSI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BLUIHFSIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.27

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.07

0.55

+1.52

Drawdowns

BLUI vs. HFSI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BLUI drawdown since its inception was -2.43%, smaller than the maximum HFSI drawdown of -19.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BLUI and HFSI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BLUIHFSIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-2.43%

-19.34%

+16.91%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.06%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.11%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.02%

-0.03%

+0.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.36%

-5.72%

+5.36%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.76%

Volatility

BLUI vs. HFSI - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BLUIHFSIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.52%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.90%

3.59%

+0.31%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.90%

4.97%

-1.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.90%

4.97%

-1.07%

BLUI vs. HFSI - Expense Ratio Comparison

BLUI has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than HFSI's 0.49% expense ratio.


Dividends

BLUI vs. HFSI - Dividend Comparison

BLUI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.70%, less than HFSI's 5.53% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
BLUI
Bluemonte Diversified Income ETF
4.70%2.91%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
HFSI
Hartford Strategic Income ETF
5.53%5.67%6.51%5.77%4.87%0.71%

Frequently Asked Questions


BLUI and HFSI have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, HFSI is cheaper at 0.49% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

HFSI is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for BLUI.

HFSI has the higher dividend yield at 5.53%, compared with 4.70% for BLUI.

They also come from different issuers: Bluemonte and Hartford. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for BLUI and 0.49% for HFSI.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BLUI and HFSI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer