BLUEX vs. ILGCX

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

BLUEX (AMG Veritas Global Real Return Fund) and ILGCX (Columbia Integrated Large Cap Growth Fund Class A) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BLUEX charges 1.15%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for ILGCX.

Performance

BLUEX vs. ILGCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AMG Veritas Global Real Return Fund (BLUEX) and Columbia Integrated Large Cap Growth Fund Class A (ILGCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

BLUEX

• 1D: -0.03%
• 1M: 1.04%
• YTD: -5.31%
• 6M: -4.15%
• 1Y: -5.32%
• 3Y*: 3.88%
• 5Y*: 0.47%
• 10Y*: 9.54%

ILGCX

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BLUEX vs. ILGCX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
BLUEX AMG Veritas Global Real Return Fund	-5.31%	4.45%	7.24%	14.35%	-13.27%
ILGCX Columbia Integrated Large Cap Growth Fund Class A	-8.30%	14.93%	31.88%	41.54%	-20.15%

Correlation

The correlation between BLUEX and ILGCX is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.28
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.44
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 10, 2022	0.62

Over the past year, the correlation between BLUEX and ILGCX has dropped to 0.28 - well below their long-term average of 0.62, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

BLUEX vs. ILGCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BLUEX

BLUEX Risk / Return Rank: 1
BLUEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1
BLUEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1
BLUEX Omega Ratio Rank: 1
BLUEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1
BLUEX Martin Ratio Rank: 1

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BLUEX vs. ILGCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AMG Veritas Global Real Return Fund (BLUEX) and Columbia Integrated Large Cap Growth Fund Class A (ILGCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BLUEX	ILGCX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.53	—	—
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-0.68	—	—
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.92	—	—
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.42	—	—
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-1.06	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BLUEX	ILGCX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.53	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.04	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.58	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.50	—	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	BLUEX	ILGCX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-54.27%	—	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.19%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-12.19%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-21.87%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-29.06%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.28%	—	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-13.37%	—	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.82%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	BLUEX	ILGCX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.20%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.64%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	9.92%	—	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	10.60%	—	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.58%	—	—

BLUEX vs. ILGCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BLUEX has a 1.15% expense ratio, which is higher than ILGCX's 0.79% expense ratio.

Dividends

BLUEX vs. ILGCX - Dividend Comparison

BLUEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.33%, less than ILGCX's 151.73% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BLUEX AMG Veritas Global Real Return Fund	0.33%	0.31%	0.29%	0.03%	11.84%	27.20%	25.43%	13.71%	13.40%	0.00%	0.00%	0.24%
ILGCX Columbia Integrated Large Cap Growth Fund Class A	151.73%	38.35%	13.20%	0.02%	33.99%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BLUEX and ILGCX in my portfolio?

BLUEX and ILGCX have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.