BLTD vs. ZTEN

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

BLTD (Bluemonte Long Term Bond ETF) and ZTEN (F/M 10-Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF) are both Long-Term Bond funds. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. BLTD charges 0.23%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for ZTEN.

Performance

BLTD vs. ZTEN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Bluemonte Long Term Bond ETF (BLTD) and F/M 10-Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (ZTEN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BLTD achieves a 0.26% return, which is significantly higher than ZTEN's 0.17% return.

BLTD

• 1D: -0.32%
• 1M: 0.87%
• YTD: 0.26%
• 6M: -0.57%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

ZTEN

• 1D: -0.28%
• 1M: 0.40%
• YTD: 0.17%
• 6M: 0.05%
• 1Y: 6.84%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BLTD vs. ZTEN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
BLTD Bluemonte Long Term Bond ETF	0.26%	3.91%
ZTEN F/M 10-Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF	0.17%	5.28%

Correlation

The correlation between BLTD and ZTEN is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 24, 2025	0.94

Return for Risk

BLTD vs. ZTEN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ZTEN

ZTEN Risk / Return Rank: 40
ZTEN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 39
ZTEN Sortino Ratio Rank: 40
ZTEN Omega Ratio Rank: 38
ZTEN Calmar Ratio Rank: 43
ZTEN Martin Ratio Rank: 42

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BLTD vs. ZTEN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bluemonte Long Term Bond ETF (BLTD) and F/M 10-Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (ZTEN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BLTD	ZTEN	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	1.38	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.65	1.15	-0.50

Drawdowns

BLTD vs. ZTEN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BLTD drawdown since its inception was -4.80%, which is greater than ZTEN's maximum drawdown of -3.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BLTD and ZTEN.

Drawdown Indicators

	BLTD	ZTEN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-4.80%	-3.43%	-1.37%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-3.32%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.48%	-1.46%	-1.02%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.57%	-0.78%	-0.79%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	1.02%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	BLTD	ZTEN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	1.61%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	3.77%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	6.84%	4.99%	+1.85%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	6.84%	5.80%	+1.04%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	6.84%	5.80%	+1.04%

BLTD vs. ZTEN - Expense Ratio Comparison

BLTD has a 0.23% expense ratio, which is higher than ZTEN's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

BLTD vs. ZTEN - Dividend Comparison

BLTD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.93%, less than ZTEN's 5.08% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
BLTD Bluemonte Long Term Bond ETF	3.93%	2.48%	0.00%
ZTEN F/M 10-Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF	5.08%	5.16%	0.44%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BLTD and ZTEN in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.94, BLTD and ZTEN move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which ETF is better, BLTD or ZTEN?

On fees, ZTEN is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, BLTD or ZTEN?

ZTEN is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.23% for BLTD.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BLTD or ZTEN?

ZTEN has the higher dividend yield at 5.08%, compared with 3.93% for BLTD.

What is the main difference between BLTD and ZTEN?

They also come from different issuers: Bluemonte and F/m. Their fees differ too: 0.23% for BLTD and 0.15% for ZTEN.