PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BLTD vs. BBLB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BLTD vs. BBLB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Bluemonte Long Term Bond ETF (BLTD) and JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Treasury Bond 20+ Year ETF (BBLB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BLTD achieves a 0.26% return, which is significantly higher than BBLB's -0.36% return.


BLTD

1D
-0.32%
1M
0.87%
YTD
0.26%
6M
-0.57%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BBLB

1D
-0.40%
1M
0.77%
YTD
-0.36%
6M
-1.96%
1Y
5.09%
3Y*
-1.70%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BLTD vs. BBLB - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between BLTD and BBLB is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 24, 2025

0.97

BLTD vs. BBLB - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
BLTD
BBLB

Financial Services

100.0%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

99.9%

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Financial Services

BLTD
100.0%
BBLB

-

Basic Materials

BLTD

-

BBLB

-

Communication Services

BLTD

-

BBLB
99.9%

Consumer Cyclical

BLTD

-

BBLB

-

Consumer Defensive

BLTD

-

BBLB

-

Energy

BLTD

-

BBLB

-

Healthcare

BLTD

-

BBLB

-

Industrials

BLTD

-

BBLB

-

Real Estate

BLTD

-

BBLB

-

Technology

BLTD

-

BBLB

-

Utilities

BLTD

-

BBLB

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BLTD vs. BBLB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BLTD

BBLB
BBLB Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
BBLB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BBLB Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
BBLB Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
BBLB Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
BBLB Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BLTD vs. BBLB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bluemonte Long Term Bond ETF (BLTD) and JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Treasury Bond 20+ Year ETF (BBLB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

BLTD vs. BBLB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BLTDBBLBDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.52

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.65

-0.17

+0.82

Drawdowns

BLTD vs. BBLB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BLTD drawdown since its inception was -4.80%, smaller than the maximum BBLB drawdown of -21.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BLTD and BBLB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BLTDBBLBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-4.80%

-21.06%

+16.26%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.53%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.95%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.48%

-8.93%

+6.45%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.57%

-8.94%

+7.37%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.00%

Volatility

BLTD vs. BBLB - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BLTDBBLBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.90%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.55%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.84%

9.80%

-2.96%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.84%

13.83%

-6.99%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.84%

13.83%

-6.99%

BLTD vs. BBLB - Expense Ratio Comparison

BLTD has a 0.23% expense ratio, which is higher than BBLB's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

BLTD vs. BBLB - Dividend Comparison

BLTD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.93%, less than BBLB's 5.00% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
BBLB
JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Treasury Bond 20+ Year ETF
5.00%5.03%5.34%2.82%
BLTD
Bluemonte Long Term Bond ETF
3.93%2.48%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.97, BLTD and BBLB move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, BBLB is cheaper at 0.04% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

BBLB is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.23% for BLTD.

BBLB has the higher dividend yield at 5.00%, compared with 3.93% for BLTD.

BLTD is categorized as Long-Term Bond, while BBLB is Government Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Bluemonte and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.23% for BLTD and 0.04% for BBLB.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BLTD and BBLB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer