BLSX vs. MUU

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

BLSX (Tradr 2X Long BLSH Daily ETF) and MUU (Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares) are both Leveraged Equities funds. BLSX is actively managed, while MUU is passively managed. BLSX charges 1.30%/yr vs 1.01%/yr for MUU.

Performance

BLSX vs. MUU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tradr 2X Long BLSH Daily ETF (BLSX) and Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares (MUU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

BLSX

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

MUU

• 1D: -26.28%
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BLSX vs. MUU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
BLSX Tradr 2X Long BLSH Daily ETF	0.00%
MUU Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares	-12.11%

Return for Risk

BLSX vs. MUU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Long BLSH Daily ETF (BLSX) and Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares (MUU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	BLSX	MUU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	—	-26.28%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	—	-26.28%	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	—	-10.19%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	BLSX	MUU	Difference
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	295.32%	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	—	295.32%	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	—	295.32%	—

BLSX vs. MUU - Expense Ratio Comparison

BLSX has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is higher than MUU's 1.01% expense ratio.

Dividends

BLSX vs. MUU - Dividend Comparison

Neither BLSX nor MUU has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Which ETF is better, BLSX or MUU?

On fees, MUU is cheaper at 1.01% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, BLSX or MUU?

MUU is cheaper with a 1.01% expense ratio, compared with 1.30% for BLSX.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BLSX or MUU?

BLSX and MUU have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between BLSX and MUU?

They also come from different issuers: Tradr ETFs and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 1.30% for BLSX and 1.01% for MUU.