BLSX vs. BMNG
BLSX (Tradr 2X Long BLSH Daily ETF) and BMNG (Leverage Shares 2X Long BMNR Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.60 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BLSX charges 1.30%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for BMNG.
Performance
BLSX vs. BMNG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
BLSX
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BMNG
- 1D
- -9.13%
- 1M
- -40.34%
- YTD
- -81.21%
- 6M
- -84.56%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BLSX vs. BMNG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BLSX Tradr 2X Long BLSH Daily ETF | -24.41% | -57.08% |
BMNG Leverage Shares 2X Long BMNR Daily ETF | -81.21% | -80.50% |
Correlation
The correlation between BLSX and BMNG is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 27, 2025 | 0.60 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BLSX vs. BMNG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Long BLSH Daily ETF (BLSX) and Leverage Shares 2X Long BMNR Daily ETF (BMNG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BLSX vs. BMNG - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BLSX | BMNG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | — | -96.50% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | — | -96.50% | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | — | -82.04% | — |
Volatility
BLSX vs. BMNG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BLSX | BMNG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 189.32% | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | — | 189.32% | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | — | 189.32% | — |
BLSX vs. BMNG - Expense Ratio Comparison
BLSX has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is higher than BMNG's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
BLSX vs. BMNG - Dividend Comparison
Neither BLSX nor BMNG has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
BLSX and BMNG have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BMNG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BMNG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.30% for BLSX.
BLSX and BMNG have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: Tradr ETFs and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 1.30% for BLSX and 0.75% for BMNG.
Find the right allocation for BLSX and BMNG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer