PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BLOX vs. FIAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BLOX vs. FIAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nicholas Crypto Income ETF (BLOX) and Nicholas Fixed Income Alternative ETF (FIAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BLOX achieves a 14.14% return, which is significantly higher than FIAX's 1.38% return.


BLOX

1D
-2.16%
1M
1.81%
YTD
14.14%
6M
8.96%
1Y
25.91%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

FIAX

1D
0.23%
1M
0.59%
YTD
1.38%
6M
1.86%
1Y
4.35%
3Y*
3.37%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BLOX vs. FIAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
BLOX
Nicholas Crypto Income ETF
14.14%8.17%
FIAX
Nicholas Fixed Income Alternative ETF
1.38%3.29%

Correlation

The correlation between BLOX and FIAX is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.33

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 17, 2025

0.32

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BLOX vs. FIAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BLOX
BLOX Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
BLOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BLOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
BLOX Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
BLOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
BLOX Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank

FIAX
FIAX Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
FIAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FIAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
FIAX Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
FIAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
FIAX Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BLOX vs. FIAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nicholas Crypto Income ETF (BLOX) and Nicholas Fixed Income Alternative ETF (FIAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BLOXFIAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.58

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.56

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

1.20

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.55

1.82

-1.27

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.11

6.62

-5.51

BLOX vs. FIAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BLOX Sharpe Ratio is 0.48, which is lower than the FIAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BLOX and FIAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BLOX vs. FIAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BLOX drawdown since its inception was -47.09%, which is greater than FIAX's maximum drawdown of -6.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BLOX and FIAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BLOXFIAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-47.09%

-6.26%

-40.83%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-47.09%

-2.40%

-44.69%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.26%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-21.10%

-0.24%

-20.86%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.66%

-0.85%

-17.81%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

23.45%

0.66%

+22.79%

Volatility

BLOX vs. FIAX - Volatility Comparison

Nicholas Crypto Income ETF (BLOX) has a higher volatility of 15.68% compared to Nicholas Fixed Income Alternative ETF (FIAX) at 0.84%. This indicates that BLOX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FIAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BLOXFIAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

15.68%

0.84%

+14.84%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

41.09%

3.40%

+37.69%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

54.17%

4.15%

+50.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

53.89%

4.03%

+49.86%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

53.89%

4.03%

+49.86%

BLOX vs. FIAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BLOX has a 1.03% expense ratio, which is lower than FIAX's 1.04% expense ratio.


Dividends

BLOX vs. FIAX - Dividend Comparison

BLOX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 40.47%, more than FIAX's 8.21% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
BLOX
Nicholas Crypto Income ETF
40.47%22.69%0.00%0.00%
FIAX
Nicholas Fixed Income Alternative ETF
8.21%8.17%8.11%4.81%

Frequently Asked Questions


BLOX and FIAX have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BLOX has higher volatility (15.68%) compared to FIAX (0.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BLOX dropped -47.09% vs FIAX's -6.26%.

On 1-year performance, BLOX leads with 25.91% vs 4.35% for FIAX. On fees, BLOX is cheaper at 1.03% per year. On volatility, FIAX has been the lower-risk option at 0.84%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, BLOX has performed better with a 25.91% return vs 4.35%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BLOX is cheaper with a 1.03% expense ratio, compared with 1.04% for FIAX.

BLOX has the higher dividend yield at 40.47%, compared with 8.21% for FIAX.

BLOX is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while FIAX is Nontraditional Bonds. Their fees differ too: 1.03% for BLOX and 1.04% for FIAX.

FIAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.06 vs 0.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BLOX and FIAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer