BLKC vs. XRPZ
BLKC (Invesco Alerian Galaxy Blockchain Users and Decentralized Commerce ETF) and XRPZ (Franklin XRP ETF) are both Blockchain funds - BLKC tracks the Alerian Galaxy Global Blockchain Equity, Trusts and ETPs Index while XRPZ tracks the CME CF XRP-Dollar Reference Rate - New York Variant. Both are passively managed. Their -0.15 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. BLKC charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for XRPZ.
Performance
BLKC vs. XRPZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
BLKC
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
XRPZ
- 1D
- -2.99%
- 1M
- 1.05%
- 6M
- -44.92%
- YTD
- -42.24%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
XRPZ Franklin XRP ETF | $2.69M | $2.76M | $3.52M |
BLKC vs. XRPZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
BLKC Invesco Alerian Galaxy Blockchain Users and Decentralized Commerce ETF | 0.34% |
XRPZ Franklin XRP ETF | -25.52% |
Correlation
The correlation between BLKC and XRPZ is -0.15, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 23, 2026 | -0.15 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BLKC vs. XRPZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Alerian Galaxy Blockchain Users and Decentralized Commerce ETF (BLKC) and Franklin XRP ETF (XRPZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BLKC vs. XRPZ - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BLKC | XRPZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | — | -55.39% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | — | -54.27% | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | — | -34.78% | — |
Volatility
BLKC vs. XRPZ - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BLKC | XRPZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 69.89% | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | — | 69.89% | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | — | 69.89% | — |
BLKC vs. XRPZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
BLKC has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than XRPZ's 0.19% expense ratio.
Dividends
BLKC vs. XRPZ - Dividend Comparison
Neither BLKC nor XRPZ has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
BLKC and XRPZ have a correlation of -0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XRPZ is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XRPZ is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for BLKC.
BLKC and XRPZ have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
BLKC tracks Alerian Galaxy Global Blockchain Equity, Trusts and ETPs Index, while XRPZ tracks CME CF XRP-Dollar Reference Rate - New York Variant. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Franklin. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for BLKC and 0.19% for XRPZ.
Find the right allocation for BLKC and XRPZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer