PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BLKC vs. XRPZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BLKC vs. XRPZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Alerian Galaxy Blockchain Users and Decentralized Commerce ETF (BLKC) and Franklin XRP ETF (XRPZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


BLKC

1D
1M
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*

XRPZ

1D
-2.99%
1M
1.05%
6M
-44.92%
YTD
-42.24%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$2.69M$2.76M$3.52M

BLKC vs. XRPZ - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between BLKC and XRPZ is -0.15, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 23, 2026

-0.15

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BLKC vs. XRPZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Alerian Galaxy Blockchain Users and Decentralized Commerce ETF (BLKC) and Franklin XRP ETF (XRPZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

BLKC vs. XRPZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BLKC vs. XRPZ - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BLKCXRPZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.39%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-54.27%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-34.78%

Volatility

BLKC vs. XRPZ - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BLKCXRPZDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

69.89%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

69.89%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

69.89%

BLKC vs. XRPZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

BLKC has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than XRPZ's 0.19% expense ratio.


Dividends

BLKC vs. XRPZ - Dividend Comparison

Neither BLKC nor XRPZ has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


BLKC and XRPZ have a correlation of -0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XRPZ is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XRPZ is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for BLKC.

BLKC and XRPZ have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

BLKC tracks Alerian Galaxy Global Blockchain Equity, Trusts and ETPs Index, while XRPZ tracks CME CF XRP-Dollar Reference Rate - New York Variant. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Franklin. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for BLKC and 0.19% for XRPZ.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BLKC and XRPZ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer