BLKC vs. IDMO
BLKC (Invesco Alerian Galaxy Blockchain Users and Decentralized Commerce ETF) and IDMO (Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BLKC is a Blockchain fund tracking the Alerian Galaxy Global Blockchain Equity, Trusts and ETPs Index, while IDMO is a Momentum fund tracking the S&P Momentum Developed ex U.S. & South Korea LargeMidCap Index. Both are passively managed. Their -0.02 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. BLKC charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for IDMO.
Performance
BLKC vs. IDMO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
BLKC
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
IDMO
- 1D
- -1.25%
- 1M
- -0.86%
- 6M
- 1.86%
- YTD
- 7.78%
- 1Y
- 20.49%
- 3Y*
- 23.80%
- 5Y*
- 14.70%
- 10Y*
- 12.22%
- ALL TIME*
- 8.86%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $19.73M | $20.30M | $22.79M |
BLKC vs. IDMO - Yearly Performance Comparison
Correlation
The correlation between BLKC and IDMO is -0.02, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 23, 2026 | -0.02 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BLKC vs. IDMO — Risk / Return Rank
BLKC
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
IDMO
BLKC vs. IDMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Alerian Galaxy Blockchain Users and Decentralized Commerce ETF (BLKC) and Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF (IDMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BLKC | IDMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.20 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.67 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 6.43 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BLKC vs. IDMO - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BLKC | IDMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | — | -39.38% | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -12.31% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -12.65% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -27.07% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -31.34% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | — | -4.37% | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | — | -9.68% | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.19% | — |
Volatility
BLKC vs. IDMO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BLKC | IDMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 5.75% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 17.17% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 18.80% | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | — | 18.16% | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | — | 17.92% | — |
BLKC vs. IDMO - Expense Ratio Comparison
BLKC has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than IDMO's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
BLKC vs. IDMO - Dividend Comparison
BLKC has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IDMO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.71%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BLKC Invesco Alerian Galaxy Blockchain Users and Decentralized Commerce ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IDMO Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF | 3.71% | 3.71% | 2.24% | 2.89% | 3.66% | 1.81% | 1.63% | 2.78% | 3.27% | 3.08% | 2.18% | 2.52% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BLKC and IDMO have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IDMO is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IDMO is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for BLKC.
IDMO has the higher dividend yield at 3.71%, compared with 0.00% for BLKC.
BLKC is categorized as Blockchain, while IDMO is Momentum. BLKC tracks Alerian Galaxy Global Blockchain Equity, Trusts and ETPs Index, while IDMO tracks S&P Momentum Developed ex U.S. & South Korea LargeMidCap Index. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for BLKC and 0.25% for IDMO.
Find the right allocation for BLKC and IDMO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer