BLDR vs. AMLP
BLDR (Builders FirstSource, Inc.) is a stock, while AMLP (Alerian MLP ETF) is MLPs fund tracking the Alerian MLP Infrastructure Index. Over the past 10 years, BLDR returned 19.57%/yr vs 6.80%/yr for AMLP. At a 0.31 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
BLDR vs. AMLP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BLDR achieves a -24.00% return, which is significantly lower than AMLP's 19.32% return. Over the past 10 years, BLDR has outperformed AMLP with an annualized return of 19.57%, while AMLP has yielded a comparatively lower 6.80% annualized return.
BLDR
- 1D
- 2.83%
- 1M
- -0.69%
- 6M
- -39.36%
- YTD
- -24.00%
- 1Y
- -37.94%
- 3Y*
- -18.22%
- 5Y*
- 13.80%
- 10Y*
- 19.57%
AMLP
- 1D
- 1.41%
- 1M
- 5.83%
- 6M
- 14.27%
- YTD
- 19.32%
- 1Y
- 20.19%
- 3Y*
- 19.61%
- 5Y*
- 19.03%
- 10Y*
- 6.80%
BLDR vs. AMLP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BLDR Builders FirstSource, Inc. | -24.00% | -28.01% | -14.38% | 157.31% | -24.30% | 110.02% | 60.61% | 132.91% | -49.93% | 98.63% |
AMLP Alerian MLP ETF | 19.32% | 5.78% | 22.76% | 21.40% | 25.47% | 39.09% | -32.26% | 5.99% | -12.67% | -7.89% |
Correlation
The correlation between BLDR and AMLP is -0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.05 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 25, 2010 | 0.31 |
The correlation between BLDR and AMLP shifts across timeframes, from -0.05 (1 year) to 0.31 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BLDR vs. AMLP — Risk / Return Rank
BLDR
AMLP
BLDR vs. AMLP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Builders FirstSource, Inc. (BLDR) and Alerian MLP ETF (AMLP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BLDR | AMLP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.38 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.38 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.89 | 1.28 | -0.39 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.69 | 2.27 | -2.95 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.18 | 6.33 | -7.51 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BLDR vs. AMLP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BLDR drawdown since its inception was -96.78%, which is greater than AMLP's maximum drawdown of -77.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BLDR and AMLP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BLDR | AMLP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -96.78% | -77.19% | -19.59% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -55.51% | -8.94% | -46.57% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -68.55% | -14.27% | -54.28% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -68.55% | -20.92% | -47.63% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -68.55% | -72.62% | +4.07% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -62.96% | -1.62% | -61.34% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -47.93% | -17.31% | -30.62% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 32.24% | 3.20% | +29.04% |
Volatility
BLDR vs. AMLP - Volatility Comparison
Builders FirstSource, Inc. (BLDR) has a higher volatility of 18.11% compared to Alerian MLP ETF (AMLP) at 5.08%. This indicates that BLDR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AMLP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BLDR | AMLP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 18.11% | 5.08% | +13.03% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 35.59% | 9.66% | +25.93% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 49.40% | 12.59% | +36.81% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 45.78% | 19.68% | +26.10% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 47.83% | 27.64% | +20.19% |
Dividends
BLDR vs. AMLP - Dividend Comparison
BLDR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AMLP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.45%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMLP Alerian MLP ETF | 7.45% | 8.36% | 7.70% | 7.86% | 7.70% | 8.55% | 12.31% | 9.12% | 9.29% | 7.97% | 8.09% | 9.84% |
BLDR Builders FirstSource, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BLDR and AMLP have a correlation of -0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BLDR has higher volatility (18.11%) compared to AMLP (5.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BLDR dropped -96.78% vs AMLP's -77.19%.
AMLP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.61 vs -0.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BLDR and AMLP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer