BLCV vs. HYMU

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Blackrock Large Cap Value ETF (BLCV) and BlackRock High Yield Muni Income Bond ETF (HYMU).

BLCV and HYMU are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. BLCV is an actively managed fund by BlackRock. It was launched on May 19, 2023. HYMU is an actively managed fund by BlackRock. It was launched on Mar 16, 2021.

Performance

BLCV vs. HYMU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Blackrock Large Cap Value ETF (BLCV) and BlackRock High Yield Muni Income Bond ETF (HYMU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

BLCV vs. HYMU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
BLCV Blackrock Large Cap Value ETF	-2.42%	19.96%	12.63%	15.71%
HYMU BlackRock High Yield Muni Income Bond ETF	0.29%	2.58%	6.99%	7.24%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BLCV achieves a -2.42% return, which is significantly lower than HYMU's 0.29% return.

BLCV

• 1D: 0.51%
• 1M: -5.31%
• YTD: -2.42%
• 6M: 1.87%
• 1Y: 13.47%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

HYMU

• 1D: 0.50%
• 1M: -1.14%
• YTD: 0.29%
• 6M: 1.40%
• 1Y: 1.57%
• 3Y*: 5.45%
• 5Y*: 1.45%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BLCV vs. HYMU - Expense Ratio Comparison

BLCV has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than HYMU's 0.35% expense ratio.

BLCV

Blackrock Large Cap Value ETF

HYMU

BlackRock High Yield Muni Income Bond ETF

Return for Risk

BLCV vs. HYMU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BLCV

BLCV Risk / Return Rank: 44
BLCV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 45
BLCV Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
BLCV Omega Ratio Rank: 44
BLCV Calmar Ratio Rank: 43
BLCV Martin Ratio Rank: 45

HYMU

HYMU Risk / Return Rank: 18
HYMU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 16
HYMU Sortino Ratio Rank: 14
HYMU Omega Ratio Rank: 18
HYMU Calmar Ratio Rank: 18
HYMU Martin Ratio Rank: 22

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BLCV vs. HYMU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Blackrock Large Cap Value ETF (BLCV) and BlackRock High Yield Muni Income Bond ETF (HYMU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BLCV	HYMU	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.87	0.20	+0.67
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.29	0.30	+0.99
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.18	1.07	+0.11
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.20	0.31	+0.89
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	4.59	1.53	+3.06
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BLCV vs. HYMU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BLCV Sharpe Ratio is 0.87, which is higher than the HYMU Sharpe Ratio of 0.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BLCV and HYMU, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BLCV	HYMU	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.87	0.20	+0.67
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.21	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.25	0.23	+1.03

Correlation

The correlation between BLCV and HYMU is 0.15, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

BLCV vs. HYMU - Dividend Comparison

BLCV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.39%, less than HYMU's 4.51% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
BLCV Blackrock Large Cap Value ETF	1.39%	1.37%	1.63%	1.02%	0.00%	0.00%
HYMU BlackRock High Yield Muni Income Bond ETF	4.51%	4.55%	4.35%	4.35%	4.01%	2.97%

Drawdowns

BLCV vs. HYMU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BLCV drawdown since its inception was -13.44%, smaller than the maximum HYMU drawdown of -22.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BLCV and HYMU.

Drawdown Indicators

	BLCV	HYMU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-13.44%	-22.55%	+9.11%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.18%	-6.54%	-4.64%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-22.55%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.34%	-1.39%	-5.95%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.07%	-6.97%	+4.90%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.91%	1.37%	+1.54%

Volatility

BLCV vs. HYMU - Volatility Comparison

Blackrock Large Cap Value ETF (BLCV) has a higher volatility of 4.69% compared to BlackRock High Yield Muni Income Bond ETF (HYMU) at 1.29%. This indicates that BLCV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HYMU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BLCV	HYMU	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.69%	1.29%	+3.40%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.73%	1.81%	+6.92%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.50%	7.95%	+7.55%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.81%	7.08%	+5.73%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	12.81%	7.05%	+5.76%