PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BLCV vs. DOGG
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

BLCV vs. DOGG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Blackrock Large Cap Value ETF (BLCV) and FT Vest DJIA Dogs 10 Target Income ETF (DOGG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

BLCV vs. DOGG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
BLCV
Blackrock Large Cap Value ETF
-2.92%19.96%12.63%15.71%
DOGG
FT Vest DJIA Dogs 10 Target Income ETF
6.85%19.43%-2.58%15.61%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BLCV achieves a -2.92% return, which is significantly lower than DOGG's 6.85% return.


BLCV

1D
2.34%
1M
-5.90%
YTD
-2.92%
6M
1.43%
1Y
12.79%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

DOGG

1D
0.51%
1M
-6.08%
YTD
6.85%
6M
13.65%
1Y
14.06%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


BLCV vs. DOGG - Expense Ratio Comparison

BLCV has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is lower than DOGG's 0.75% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

BLCV vs. DOGG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BLCV
BLCV Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
BLCV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BLCV Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
BLCV Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
BLCV Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
BLCV Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank

DOGG
DOGG Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
DOGG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DOGG Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
DOGG Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
DOGG Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
DOGG Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BLCV vs. DOGG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Blackrock Large Cap Value ETF (BLCV) and FT Vest DJIA Dogs 10 Target Income ETF (DOGG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BLCVDOGGDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.83

1.11

-0.28

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.23

1.55

-0.32

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.21

-0.04

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.22

1.62

-0.40

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.76

5.13

-0.38

BLCV vs. DOGG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BLCV Sharpe Ratio is 0.83, which is comparable to the DOGG Sharpe Ratio of 1.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BLCV and DOGG, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BLCVDOGGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.83

1.11

-0.28

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.24

0.95

+0.29

Correlation

The correlation between BLCV and DOGG is 0.66, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

BLCV vs. DOGG - Dividend Comparison

BLCV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.40%, less than DOGG's 8.53% yield.


TTM202520242023
BLCV
Blackrock Large Cap Value ETF
1.40%1.37%1.63%1.02%
DOGG
FT Vest DJIA Dogs 10 Target Income ETF
8.53%8.75%9.92%5.89%

Drawdowns

BLCV vs. DOGG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BLCV drawdown since its inception was -13.44%, which is greater than DOGG's maximum drawdown of -11.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BLCV and DOGG.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


BLCVDOGGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.44%

-11.19%

-2.25%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.18%

-8.51%

-2.67%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.81%

-6.08%

-1.73%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.06%

-2.98%

+0.92%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.87%

3.01%

-0.14%

Volatility

BLCV vs. DOGG - Volatility Comparison

Blackrock Large Cap Value ETF (BLCV) has a higher volatility of 4.74% compared to FT Vest DJIA Dogs 10 Target Income ETF (DOGG) at 3.19%. This indicates that BLCV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DOGG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


BLCVDOGGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.74%

3.19%

+1.55%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.73%

7.72%

+1.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.51%

12.83%

+2.68%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.81%

13.01%

-0.20%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.81%

13.01%

-0.20%