PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BLCN vs. BITQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

BLCN vs. BITQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Siren ETF Trust Siren Nasdaq NexGen Economy ETF (BLCN) and Bitwise Crypto Industry Innovators ETF (BITQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

BLCN vs. BITQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
BLCN
Siren ETF Trust Siren Nasdaq NexGen Economy ETF
-11.69%-3.69%5.62%21.09%-51.76%-6.07%
BITQ
Bitwise Crypto Industry Innovators ETF
-5.92%18.00%46.97%246.83%-83.86%-7.06%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BLCN achieves a -11.69% return, which is significantly lower than BITQ's -5.92% return.


BLCN

1D
0.76%
1M
-6.50%
YTD
-11.69%
6M
-22.06%
1Y
13.51%
3Y*
0.94%
5Y*
-14.37%
10Y*

BITQ

1D
-0.58%
1M
-8.31%
YTD
-5.92%
6M
-26.36%
1Y
47.29%
3Y*
48.40%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


BLCN vs. BITQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

BLCN has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is lower than BITQ's 0.85% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

BLCN vs. BITQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BLCN
BLCN Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
BLCN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BLCN Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
BLCN Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
BLCN Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
BLCN Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank

BITQ
BITQ Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
BITQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BITQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
BITQ Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
BITQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
BITQ Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BLCN vs. BITQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Siren ETF Trust Siren Nasdaq NexGen Economy ETF (BLCN) and Bitwise Crypto Industry Innovators ETF (BITQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BLCNBITQDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.34

0.81

-0.47

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.78

1.45

-0.67

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.09

1.17

-0.07

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.47

1.21

-0.74

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

1.14

2.74

-1.60

BLCN vs. BITQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BLCN Sharpe Ratio is 0.34, which is lower than the BITQ Sharpe Ratio of 0.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BLCN and BITQ, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BLCNBITQDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.34

0.81

-0.47

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.42

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.02

-0.05

+0.03

Correlation

The correlation between BLCN and BITQ is 0.73, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

BLCN vs. BITQ - Dividend Comparison

BLCN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.41%, while BITQ has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018
BLCN
Siren ETF Trust Siren Nasdaq NexGen Economy ETF
3.41%3.01%0.67%0.54%1.28%0.56%0.58%1.45%1.16%
BITQ
Bitwise Crypto Industry Innovators ETF
0.00%0.00%0.90%1.51%0.00%3.12%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

BLCN vs. BITQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BLCN drawdown since its inception was -67.51%, smaller than the maximum BITQ drawdown of -90.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BLCN and BITQ.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


BLCNBITQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-67.51%

-90.32%

+22.81%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-29.53%

-44.99%

+15.46%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-67.51%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-57.14%

-42.16%

-14.98%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-29.87%

-53.86%

+23.99%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.25%

19.87%

-7.62%

Volatility

BLCN vs. BITQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Siren ETF Trust Siren Nasdaq NexGen Economy ETF (BLCN) is 12.51%, while Bitwise Crypto Industry Innovators ETF (BITQ) has a volatility of 17.63%. This indicates that BLCN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BITQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


BLCNBITQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.51%

17.63%

-5.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

26.28%

45.99%

-19.71%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

39.96%

58.97%

-19.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

34.08%

67.77%

-33.69%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

30.88%

67.77%

-36.89%