BLCH.DE vs. GN0M.DE
BLCH.DE (Global X Blockchain UCITS ETF USD Accumulating) and GN0M.DE (Global X Genomics & Biotechnology UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BLCH.DE is a Technology Equities fund tracking the Solactive Blockchain, while GN0M.DE is a Health & Biotech Equities fund tracking the Solactive Genomics. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, BLCH.DE returned 56.73%/yr vs -1.90%/yr for GN0M.DE. At a 0.46 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.50% expense ratio.
Performance
BLCH.DE vs. GN0M.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BLCH.DE achieves a 32.88% return, which is significantly higher than GN0M.DE's 12.99% return.
BLCH.DE
- 1D
- -4.18%
- 1M
- -0.70%
- YTD
- 32.88%
- 6M
- 14.42%
- 1Y
- 94.65%
- 3Y*
- 56.73%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GN0M.DE
- 1D
- 5.61%
- 1M
- 11.50%
- YTD
- 12.99%
- 6M
- 9.82%
- 1Y
- 55.73%
- 3Y*
- -1.90%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BLCH.DE vs. GN0M.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BLCH.DE Global X Blockchain UCITS ETF USD Accumulating | 32.88% | 20.01% | 12.63% | 318.01% | -78.59% |
GN0M.DE Global X Genomics & Biotechnology UCITS ETF | 12.99% | 5.67% | -12.40% | -9.04% | -13.72% |
Correlation
The correlation between BLCH.DE and GN0M.DE is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 26, 2022 | 0.46 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BLCH.DE vs. GN0M.DE — Risk / Return Rank
BLCH.DE
GN0M.DE
BLCH.DE vs. GN0M.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Blockchain UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (BLCH.DE) and Global X Genomics & Biotechnology UCITS ETF (GN0M.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BLCH.DE | GN0M.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.54 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.83 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.33 | -0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.84 | 3.32 | -1.49 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.38 | 8.35 | -4.97 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BLCH.DE | GN0M.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.47 | 2.00 | -0.54 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.15 | -0.34 | +0.50 |
Drawdowns
BLCH.DE vs. GN0M.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BLCH.DE drawdown since its inception was -83.29%, which is greater than GN0M.DE's maximum drawdown of -67.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BLCH.DE and GN0M.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BLCH.DE | GN0M.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -83.29% | -67.19% | -16.10% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -54.12% | -16.68% | -37.44% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -60.08% | -48.19% | -11.89% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -24.94% | -41.03% | +16.09% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -44.08% | -43.13% | -0.95% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 29.42% | 6.65% | +22.77% |
Volatility
BLCH.DE vs. GN0M.DE - Volatility Comparison
Global X Blockchain UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (BLCH.DE) has a higher volatility of 16.11% compared to Global X Genomics & Biotechnology UCITS ETF (GN0M.DE) at 8.15%. This indicates that BLCH.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GN0M.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BLCH.DE | GN0M.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 16.11% | 8.15% | +7.96% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 46.03% | 19.69% | +26.34% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 67.91% | 27.68% | +40.23% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 74.21% | 31.49% | +42.72% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 74.21% | 31.49% | +42.72% |
BLCH.DE vs. GN0M.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both BLCH.DE and GN0M.DE have an expense ratio of 0.50%.
Dividends
BLCH.DE vs. GN0M.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither BLCH.DE nor GN0M.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
BLCH.DE and GN0M.DE have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.50% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BLCH.DE and GN0M.DE have the same expense ratio: 0.50% per year.
BLCH.DE is categorized as Technology Equities, while GN0M.DE is Health & Biotech Equities. BLCH.DE tracks Solactive Blockchain, while GN0M.DE tracks Solactive Genomics.
Find the right allocation for BLCH.DE and GN0M.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer