PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BKV vs. ECO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

BKV vs. ECO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BKV Corp (BKV) and Okeanis Eco Tankers Corp (ECO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BKV achieves a -9.91% return, which is significantly lower than ECO's 90.59% return.


BKV

1D
1.62%
1M
-10.07%
6M
-17.78%
YTD
-9.91%
1Y
18.51%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
16.19%

ECO

1D
0.79%
1M
20.80%
6M
59.28%
YTD
90.59%
1Y
185.56%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
48.73%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$23.05M$20.19M$22.46M
$18.81M$22.75M$24.38M

BKV vs. ECO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
BKV
BKV Corp
-9.91%14.17%28.19%
ECO
Okeanis Eco Tankers Corp
90.59%71.94%-32.91%

Correlation

The correlation between BKV and ECO is 0.07, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.07

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 26, 2024

0.12

Fundamentals

Market Cap

BKV:

$2.68B

ECO:

$1.97B

EPS

BKV:

$3.17

ECO:

$5.73

PE Ratio

BKV:

7.73

ECO:

10.53

PS Ratio

BKV:

2.11

ECO:

4.35

PB Ratio

BKV:

1.08

ECO:

3.17

Total Revenue (TTM)

BKV:

$1.08B

ECO:

$481.57M

Gross Profit (TTM)

BKV:

$693.49M

ECO:

$274.61M

EBITDA (TTM)

BKV:

$544.16M

ECO:

$284.05M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BKV vs. ECO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

BKV
BKV Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
BKV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BKV Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
BKV Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
BKV Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
BKV Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank

ECO
ECO Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
ECO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ECO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
ECO Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
ECO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
ECO Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

BKV vs. ECO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BKV Corp (BKV) and Okeanis Eco Tankers Corp (ECO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BKVECODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-4.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.67

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

1.55

-0.44

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.68

10.57

-9.90

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.68

29.65

-27.98

BKV vs. ECO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BKV Sharpe Ratio is 0.45, which is lower than the ECO Sharpe Ratio of 4.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BKV and ECO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BKV vs. ECO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BKV drawdown since its inception was -39.98%, smaller than the maximum ECO drawdown of -46.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BKV and ECO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BKVECODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.98%

-46.15%

+6.17%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-27.52%

-17.66%

-9.86%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-23.94%

0.00%

-23.94%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.15%

-14.58%

+2.43%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.07%

6.29%

+4.78%

Volatility

BKV vs. ECO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BKV Corp (BKV) is 10.10%, while Okeanis Eco Tankers Corp (ECO) has a volatility of 13.44%. This indicates that BKV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ECO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BKVECODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.10%

13.44%

-3.34%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

26.67%

31.16%

-4.49%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

41.73%

41.51%

+0.22%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

42.88%

42.20%

+0.68%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

42.88%

42.20%

+0.68%

Dividends

BKV vs. ECO - Dividend Comparison

BKV has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ECO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.29%.


PositionTTM20252024
BKV
BKV Corp
0.00%0.00%0.00%
ECO
Okeanis Eco Tankers Corp
8.29%6.26%15.57%

Financials

BKV vs. ECO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between BKV Corp and Okeanis Eco Tankers Corp. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

BKV vs. ECO - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between BKV Corp and Okeanis Eco Tankers Corp over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

BKV - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, BKV Corp reported a gross profit of 405.49M and revenue of 432.85M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 93.7%.

ECO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Okeanis Eco Tankers Corp reported a gross profit of 109.68M and revenue of 170.17M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 64.5%.

BKV - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, BKV Corp reported an operating income of 86.03M and revenue of 432.85M, resulting in an operating margin of 19.9%.

ECO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Okeanis Eco Tankers Corp reported an operating income of 98.06M and revenue of 170.17M, resulting in an operating margin of 57.6%.

BKV - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, BKV Corp reported a net income of 44.08M and revenue of 432.85M, resulting in a net margin of 10.2%.

ECO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Okeanis Eco Tankers Corp reported a net income of 88.32M and revenue of 170.17M, resulting in a net margin of 51.9%.


Frequently Asked Questions


BKV and ECO have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ECO has higher volatility (13.44%) compared to BKV (10.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BKV dropped -39.98% vs ECO's -46.15%.

ECO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.51 vs 0.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BKV and ECO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer