BKUI vs. MINT
BKUI (BNY Mellon Ultra Short Income ETF) and MINT (PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ETF) are both Ultrashort Bond funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, BKUI returned 5.21%/yr vs 5.41%/yr for MINT. At a 0.32 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BKUI charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.36%/yr for MINT.
Performance
BKUI vs. MINT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BKUI achieves a 1.42% return, which is significantly lower than MINT's 1.81% return.
BKUI
- 1D
- -0.01%
- 1M
- 0.33%
- YTD
- 1.42%
- 6M
- 1.74%
- 1Y
- 4.32%
- 3Y*
- 5.21%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MINT
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.36%
- YTD
- 1.81%
- 6M
- 2.20%
- 1Y
- 4.67%
- 3Y*
- 5.41%
- 5Y*
- 3.47%
- 10Y*
- 2.70%
BKUI vs. MINT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BKUI BNY Mellon Ultra Short Income ETF | 1.42% | 4.93% | 5.50% | 5.75% | -0.08% | -0.26% |
MINT PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ETF | 1.81% | 4.74% | 5.94% | 6.26% | -1.01% | -0.20% |
Correlation
The correlation between BKUI and MINT is -0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.08 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.05 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 12, 2021 | 0.32 |
The correlation between BKUI and MINT shifts across timeframes, from -0.08 (1 year) to 0.32 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BKUI vs. MINT — Risk / Return Rank
BKUI
MINT
BKUI vs. MINT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNY Mellon Ultra Short Income ETF (BKUI) and PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ETF (MINT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BKUI | MINT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -6.57 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -40.29 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 6.02 | 20.53 | -14.51 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 32.56 | 94.30 | -61.74 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 230.94 | 939.26 | -708.31 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BKUI | MINT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.52 | 17.09 | -6.57 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 5.99 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 2.87 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 6.08 | 2.47 | +3.62 |
Drawdowns
BKUI vs. MINT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BKUI drawdown since its inception was -1.72%, smaller than the maximum MINT drawdown of -4.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BKUI and MINT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BKUI | MINT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -1.72% | -4.62% | +2.90% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.13% | -0.05% | -0.08% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -0.25% | -0.16% | -0.09% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -2.42% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -4.62% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.01% | 0.00% | -0.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.27% | -0.17% | -0.10% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.02% | 0.00% | +0.02% |
Volatility
BKUI vs. MINT - Volatility Comparison
BNY Mellon Ultra Short Income ETF (BKUI) has a higher volatility of 0.15% compared to PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ETF (MINT) at 0.09%. This indicates that BKUI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MINT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BKUI | MINT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.15% | 0.09% | +0.06% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.31% | 0.20% | +0.11% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.41% | 0.27% | +0.14% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 0.59% | 0.58% | +0.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 0.59% | 0.95% | -0.36% |
BKUI vs. MINT - Expense Ratio Comparison
BKUI has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than MINT's 0.36% expense ratio.
Dividends
BKUI vs. MINT - Dividend Comparison
BKUI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.21%, less than MINT's 4.28% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BKUI BNY Mellon Ultra Short Income ETF | 4.21% | 4.48% | 5.11% | 4.29% | 1.82% | 0.22% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MINT PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ETF | 4.28% | 4.63% | 5.22% | 4.91% | 1.90% | 0.44% | 1.15% | 2.65% | 2.32% | 1.61% | 1.35% | 0.88% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BKUI and MINT have a correlation of -0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BKUI has higher volatility (0.15%) compared to MINT (0.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BKUI dropped -1.72% vs MINT's -4.62%.
On 3-year performance, MINT leads with 5.41% vs 5.21% for BKUI. On fees, BKUI is cheaper at 0.12% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, MINT has performed better with a 5.41% return vs 5.21%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BKUI is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.36% for MINT.
MINT has the higher dividend yield at 4.28%, compared with 4.21% for BKUI.
They also come from different issuers: BNY Mellon and PIMCO. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for BKUI and 0.36% for MINT.
MINT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (17.09 vs 10.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BKUI and MINT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer