BKUI vs. CUSD

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about BNY Mellon Ultra Short Income ETF (BKUI) and CrossingBridge Ultra-Short Duration ETF (CUSD).

BKUI and CUSD are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. BKUI is an actively managed fund by BNY Mellon. It was launched on Aug 9, 2021. CUSD is an actively managed fund by CrossingBridge. It was launched on Sep 20, 2021.

Performance

BKUI vs. CUSD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BNY Mellon Ultra Short Income ETF (BKUI) and CrossingBridge Ultra-Short Duration ETF (CUSD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

BKUI vs. CUSD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
BKUI BNY Mellon Ultra Short Income ETF	0.74%	4.93%	5.50%	5.75%	-0.08%	-0.32%
CUSD CrossingBridge Ultra-Short Duration ETF	2.92%	5.02%	4.57%	6.05%	2.03%	2.40%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BKUI achieves a 0.74% return, which is significantly lower than CUSD's 2.92% return.

BKUI

• 1D: 0.01%
• 1M: 0.07%
• YTD: 0.74%
• 6M: 1.82%
• 1Y: 4.36%
• 3Y*: 5.30%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CUSD

• 1D: 1.58%
• 1M: 1.88%
• YTD: 2.92%
• 6M: 3.01%
• 1Y: 6.54%
• 3Y*: 5.62%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BKUI vs. CUSD - Expense Ratio Comparison

BKUI has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than CUSD's 0.81% expense ratio.

CUSD

CrossingBridge Ultra-Short Duration ETF

BKUI

BNY Mellon Ultra Short Income ETF

Return for Risk

BKUI vs. CUSD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BKUI

BKUI Risk / Return Rank: 99
BKUI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
BKUI Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
BKUI Omega Ratio Rank: 99
BKUI Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
BKUI Martin Ratio Rank: 99

CUSD

CUSD Risk / Return Rank: 35
CUSD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 27
CUSD Sortino Ratio Rank: 28
CUSD Omega Ratio Rank: 36
CUSD Calmar Ratio Rank: 45
CUSD Martin Ratio Rank: 38

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BKUI vs. CUSD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNY Mellon Ultra Short Income ETF (BKUI) and CrossingBridge Ultra-Short Duration ETF (CUSD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BKUI	CUSD	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	9.52	0.51	+9.01
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	20.08	0.86	+19.22
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	4.99	1.15	+3.84
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	17.21	1.22	+16.00
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	112.11	3.53	+108.59
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BKUI vs. CUSD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BKUI Sharpe Ratio is 9.52, which is higher than the CUSD Sharpe Ratio of 0.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BKUI and CUSD, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BKUI	CUSD	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	9.52	0.51	+9.01
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	6.01	0.79	+5.22

Correlation

The correlation between BKUI and CUSD is -0.00. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.

Dividends

BKUI vs. CUSD - Dividend Comparison

BKUI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.34%, less than CUSD's 13.65% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
BKUI BNY Mellon Ultra Short Income ETF	4.34%	4.48%	5.11%	4.29%	1.82%	0.22%
CUSD CrossingBridge Ultra-Short Duration ETF	13.65%	14.05%	7.10%	3.62%	1.14%	0.00%

Drawdowns

BKUI vs. CUSD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BKUI drawdown since its inception was -1.72%, smaller than the maximum CUSD drawdown of -5.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BKUI and CUSD.

Drawdown Indicators

	BKUI	CUSD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-1.72%	-5.42%	+3.70%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-0.25%	-5.42%	+5.17%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-1.31%	+1.31%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.28%	-0.40%	+0.12%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.04%	1.87%	-1.83%

Volatility

BKUI vs. CUSD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BNY Mellon Ultra Short Income ETF (BKUI) is 0.19%, while CrossingBridge Ultra-Short Duration ETF (CUSD) has a volatility of 3.92%. This indicates that BKUI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CUSD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BKUI	CUSD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.19%	3.92%	-3.73%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	0.28%	9.34%	-9.06%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.46%	12.81%	-12.35%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	0.59%	6.50%	-5.91%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	0.59%	6.50%	-5.91%