PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BKSE vs. RZG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BKSE vs. RZG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BNY Mellon US Small Cap Core Equity ETF (BKSE) and Invesco S&P SmallCap 600® Pure Growth ETF (RZG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BKSE achieves a 20.27% return, which is significantly lower than RZG's 28.77% return.


BKSE

1D
1.78%
1M
1.08%
6M
13.72%
YTD
20.27%
1Y
37.25%
3Y*
16.98%
5Y*
9.11%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
16.75%

RZG

1D
1.96%
1M
-2.46%
6M
20.37%
YTD
28.77%
1Y
39.31%
3Y*
18.12%
5Y*
6.22%
10Y*
9.98%
ALL TIME*
9.31%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$343.03K$235.90K$242.30K
$1.14M$1.62M$1.03M

BKSE vs. RZG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
BKSE
BNY Mellon US Small Cap Core Equity ETF
20.27%13.09%9.56%22.37%-18.44%16.18%53.89%
RZG
Invesco S&P SmallCap 600® Pure Growth ETF
28.77%10.22%9.84%19.15%-29.00%21.01%73.20%

Correlation

The correlation between BKSE and RZG is 0.91, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 9, 2020

0.93

The correlation between BKSE and RZG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

BKSE vs. RZG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
BKSE
RZG

Financial Services

16.4%
15.1%

Technology

16.0%
17.3%

Industrials

14.9%
16.4%

Healthcare

14.2%
25.1%

Consumer Cyclical

13.5%
9.1%

Real Estate

7.2%
6.8%

Energy

5.9%
2.4%

Basic Materials

4.3%
0.4%

Utilities

3.1%
0.4%

Consumer Defensive

2.6%
5.6%

Communication Services

2.0%
1.7%

Financial Services

BKSE
16.4%
RZG
15.1%

Technology

BKSE
16.0%
RZG
17.3%

Industrials

BKSE
14.9%
RZG
16.4%

Healthcare

BKSE
14.2%
RZG
25.1%

Consumer Cyclical

BKSE
13.5%
RZG
9.1%

Real Estate

BKSE
7.2%
RZG
6.8%

Energy

BKSE
5.9%
RZG
2.4%

Basic Materials

BKSE
4.3%
RZG
0.4%

Utilities

BKSE
3.1%
RZG
0.4%

Consumer Defensive

BKSE
2.6%
RZG
5.6%

Communication Services

BKSE
2.0%
RZG
1.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BKSE vs. RZG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

BKSE
BKSE Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
BKSE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BKSE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
BKSE Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
BKSE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
BKSE Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank

RZG
RZG Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
RZG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RZG Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
RZG Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
RZG Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
RZG Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

BKSE vs. RZG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNY Mellon US Small Cap Core Equity ETF (BKSE) and Invesco S&P SmallCap 600® Pure Growth ETF (RZG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BKSERZGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.11

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.09

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.34

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.98

4.58

-0.60

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.29

14.18

+0.11

BKSE vs. RZG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BKSE Sharpe Ratio is 2.16, which is comparable to the RZG Sharpe Ratio of 2.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BKSE and RZG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BKSE vs. RZG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BKSE drawdown since its inception was -29.08%, smaller than the maximum RZG drawdown of -58.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BKSE and RZG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BKSERZGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-29.08%

-58.52%

+29.44%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.40%

-8.63%

-0.77%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.76%

-25.73%

-1.03%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.08%

-38.33%

+9.25%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-54.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-3.99%

+3.99%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.85%

-12.04%

+3.19%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.61%

2.78%

-0.17%

Volatility

BKSE vs. RZG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BNY Mellon US Small Cap Core Equity ETF (BKSE) is 3.80%, while Invesco S&P SmallCap 600® Pure Growth ETF (RZG) has a volatility of 6.10%. This indicates that BKSE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RZG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BKSERZGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.80%

6.10%

-2.30%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.99%

14.80%

-2.81%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.39%

19.32%

-1.93%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.36%

23.05%

-1.69%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.13%

24.66%

-2.53%

BKSE vs. RZG - Expense Ratio Comparison

BKSE has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than RZG's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

BKSE vs. RZG - Dividend Comparison

BKSE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.19%, more than RZG's 0.44% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BKSE
BNY Mellon US Small Cap Core Equity ETF
1.19%1.26%1.55%1.38%1.50%1.17%0.82%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
RZG
Invesco S&P SmallCap 600® Pure Growth ETF
0.44%0.37%0.95%1.43%1.59%0.22%0.49%0.70%0.46%0.44%0.65%0.70%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, BKSE and RZG move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

RZG has higher volatility (6.10%) compared to BKSE (3.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BKSE dropped -29.08% vs RZG's -58.52%.

On 5-year performance, BKSE leads with 9.11% vs 6.22% for RZG. On fees, BKSE is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, BKSE has been the lower-risk option at 3.80%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, BKSE has performed better with a 9.11% return vs 6.22%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BKSE is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for RZG.

BKSE has the higher dividend yield at 1.19%, compared with 0.44% for RZG.

BKSE tracks Morningstar US Small Cap Index, while RZG tracks S&P Small Cap 600 Pure Growth. They also come from different issuers: BNY Mellon and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for BKSE and 0.35% for RZG.

BKSE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.16 vs 2.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BKSE and RZG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer