BKMS vs. VTEB
BKMS (BNY Mellon Municipal Short Duration ETF) and VTEB (Vanguard Tax-Exempt Bond ETF) are both Municipal Bonds funds. BKMS is actively managed, while VTEB is passively managed. A 0.50 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BKMS charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for VTEB.
Performance
BKMS vs. VTEB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
BKMS
- 1D
- 0.07%
- 1M
- 0.64%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VTEB
- 1D
- 0.12%
- 1M
- 1.50%
- YTD
- 1.82%
- 6M
- 1.94%
- 1Y
- 6.78%
- 3Y*
- 3.42%
- 5Y*
- 0.98%
- 10Y*
- 1.98%
BKMS vs. VTEB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
BKMS BNY Mellon Municipal Short Duration ETF | 0.79% |
VTEB Vanguard Tax-Exempt Bond ETF | 1.24% |
Correlation
The correlation between BKMS and VTEB is 0.50, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 12, 2026 | 0.50 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BKMS vs. VTEB — Risk / Return Rank
BKMS
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
VTEB
BKMS vs. VTEB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNY Mellon Municipal Short Duration ETF (BKMS) and Vanguard Tax-Exempt Bond ETF (VTEB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BKMS | VTEB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.55 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.51 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 8.86 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BKMS vs. VTEB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BKMS drawdown since its inception was -0.87%, smaller than the maximum VTEB drawdown of -17.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BKMS and VTEB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BKMS | VTEB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -0.87% | -17.00% | +16.13% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -2.71% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -5.53% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -12.64% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -17.00% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.17% | +0.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.26% | -2.32% | +2.06% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.77% | — |
Volatility
BKMS vs. VTEB - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BKMS | VTEB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.72% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 2.06% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.22% | 2.68% | -1.46% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 1.22% | 3.90% | -2.68% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 1.22% | 5.25% | -4.03% |
BKMS vs. VTEB - Expense Ratio Comparison
BKMS has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than VTEB's 0.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
BKMS vs. VTEB - Dividend Comparison
BKMS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.11%, less than VTEB's 3.34% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BKMS BNY Mellon Municipal Short Duration ETF | 1.11% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VTEB Vanguard Tax-Exempt Bond ETF | 3.34% | 3.29% | 3.14% | 2.79% | 2.09% | 1.64% | 1.99% | 2.30% | 2.25% | 1.96% | 1.66% | 0.58% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BKMS and VTEB have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, VTEB is cheaper at 0.03% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VTEB is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for BKMS.
VTEB has the higher dividend yield at 3.34%, compared with 1.11% for BKMS.
They also come from different issuers: BNY Mellon and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for BKMS and 0.03% for VTEB.
Find the right allocation for BKMS and VTEB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer