BKMS vs. PSCE
BKMS (BNY Mellon Municipal Short Duration ETF) and PSCE (Invesco S&P SmallCap Energy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BKMS is a Municipal Bonds fund actively managed by BNY Mellon, while PSCE is a Energy Equities fund tracking the S&P SmallCap 600 Energy Index. BKMS is actively managed, while PSCE is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.33, they often move in opposite directions. BKMS charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for PSCE.
Performance
BKMS vs. PSCE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
BKMS
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- 0.26%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PSCE
- 1D
- 0.90%
- 1M
- -4.11%
- YTD
- 43.61%
- 6M
- 35.01%
- 1Y
- 66.01%
- 3Y*
- 13.95%
- 5Y*
- 10.97%
- 10Y*
- -1.93%
BKMS vs. PSCE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
BKMS BNY Mellon Municipal Short Duration ETF | 0.58% |
PSCE Invesco S&P SmallCap Energy ETF | 36.50% |
Correlation
The correlation between BKMS and PSCE is -0.33, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 13, 2026 | -0.33 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BKMS vs. PSCE — Risk / Return Rank
BKMS
PSCE
BKMS vs. PSCE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNY Mellon Municipal Short Duration ETF (BKMS) and Invesco S&P SmallCap Energy ETF (PSCE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BKMS | PSCE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.48 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.29 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | -0.04 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.20 | -0.09 | +1.29 |
Drawdowns
BKMS vs. PSCE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BKMS drawdown since its inception was -0.87%, smaller than the maximum PSCE drawdown of -96.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BKMS and PSCE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BKMS | PSCE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -0.87% | -96.21% | +95.34% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -9.41% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -44.57% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -45.42% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -90.70% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.13% | -74.48% | +74.35% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.29% | -58.84% | +58.55% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.75% | — |
Volatility
BKMS vs. PSCE - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BKMS | PSCE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 7.99% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 18.55% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.25% | 26.82% | -25.57% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 1.25% | 37.44% | -36.19% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 1.25% | 43.25% | -42.00% |
BKMS vs. PSCE - Expense Ratio Comparison
BKMS has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than PSCE's 0.29% expense ratio.
Dividends
BKMS vs. PSCE - Dividend Comparison
BKMS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.11%, less than PSCE's 1.82% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BKMS BNY Mellon Municipal Short Duration ETF | 1.11% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PSCE Invesco S&P SmallCap Energy ETF | 1.82% | 2.39% | 1.70% | 2.57% | 1.70% | 0.46% | 0.87% | 0.14% | 0.22% | 0.04% | 0.22% | 0.82% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BKMS and PSCE have a correlation of -0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, PSCE is cheaper at 0.29% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PSCE is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for BKMS.
PSCE has the higher dividend yield at 1.82%, compared with 1.11% for BKMS.
BKMS is categorized as Municipal Bonds, while PSCE is Energy Equities. They also come from different issuers: BNY Mellon and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for BKMS and 0.29% for PSCE.
Find the right allocation for BKMS and PSCE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer