BKMS vs. IMF

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

BKMS (BNY Mellon Municipal Short Duration ETF) and IMF (Invesco Managed Futures Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BKMS is a Municipal Bonds fund actively managed by BNY Mellon, while IMF is a Systematic Trend fund actively managed by Invesco. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.28, they often move in opposite directions. BKMS charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for IMF.

Performance

BKMS vs. IMF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BNY Mellon Municipal Short Duration ETF (BKMS) and Invesco Managed Futures Strategy ETF (IMF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

BKMS

• 1D: 0.07%
• 1M: 0.64%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

IMF

• 1D: -1.40%
• 1M: -3.64%
• YTD: 9.81%
• 6M: 10.46%
• 1Y: 18.03%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BKMS vs. IMF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
BKMS BNY Mellon Municipal Short Duration ETF	0.79%
IMF Invesco Managed Futures Strategy ETF	6.88%

Correlation

The correlation between BKMS and IMF is -0.28, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 12, 2026	-0.28

Return for Risk

BKMS vs. IMF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BKMS

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

IMF

IMF Risk / Return Rank: 67
IMF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 58
IMF Sortino Ratio Rank: 52
IMF Omega Ratio Rank: 63
IMF Calmar Ratio Rank: 83
IMF Martin Ratio Rank: 80

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BKMS vs. IMF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNY Mellon Municipal Short Duration ETF (BKMS) and Invesco Managed Futures Strategy ETF (IMF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BKMS	IMF	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.72	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	2.25	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.34	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	3.99	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	14.05	—

Drawdowns

BKMS vs. IMF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BKMS drawdown since its inception was -0.87%, smaller than the maximum IMF drawdown of -15.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BKMS and IMF.

Drawdown Indicators

	BKMS	IMF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-0.87%	-15.29%	+14.42%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-4.54%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-4.54%	+4.54%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.26%	-8.29%	+8.03%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	1.29%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	BKMS	IMF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	2.89%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	9.28%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.22%	10.52%	-9.30%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	1.22%	12.44%	-11.22%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	1.22%	12.44%	-11.22%

BKMS vs. IMF - Expense Ratio Comparison

BKMS has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than IMF's 0.65% expense ratio.

Dividends

BKMS vs. IMF - Dividend Comparison

BKMS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.11%, more than IMF's 0.92% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
BKMS BNY Mellon Municipal Short Duration ETF	1.11%	0.00%
IMF Invesco Managed Futures Strategy ETF	0.92%	1.01%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BKMS and IMF in my portfolio?

BKMS and IMF have a correlation of -0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, BKMS or IMF?

On fees, BKMS is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, BKMS or IMF?

BKMS is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for IMF.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BKMS or IMF?

BKMS has the higher dividend yield at 1.11%, compared with 0.92% for IMF.

What is the main difference between BKMS and IMF?

BKMS is categorized as Municipal Bonds, while IMF is Systematic Trend. They also come from different issuers: BNY Mellon and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for BKMS and 0.65% for IMF.