BKMS vs. FUMB
BKMS (BNY Mellon Municipal Short Duration ETF) and FUMB (First Trust Ultra Short Duration Municipal ETF) are both Municipal Bonds funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.33 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BKMS charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for FUMB.
Performance
BKMS vs. FUMB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
BKMS
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- 0.26%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FUMB
- 1D
- -0.03%
- 1M
- 0.15%
- YTD
- 1.07%
- 6M
- 1.30%
- 1Y
- 2.55%
- 3Y*
- 2.98%
- 5Y*
- 1.96%
- 10Y*
- —
BKMS vs. FUMB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
BKMS BNY Mellon Municipal Short Duration ETF | 0.58% |
FUMB First Trust Ultra Short Duration Municipal ETF | 0.82% |
Correlation
The correlation between BKMS and FUMB is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 13, 2026 | 0.33 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BKMS vs. FUMB — Risk / Return Rank
BKMS
FUMB
BKMS vs. FUMB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNY Mellon Municipal Short Duration ETF (BKMS) and First Trust Ultra Short Duration Municipal ETF (FUMB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BKMS | FUMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 3.38 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 1.70 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.20 | 1.00 | +0.20 |
Drawdowns
BKMS vs. FUMB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BKMS drawdown since its inception was -0.87%, smaller than the maximum FUMB drawdown of -2.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BKMS and FUMB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BKMS | FUMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -0.87% | -2.68% | +1.81% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -0.22% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -0.60% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -1.25% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.13% | -0.03% | -0.10% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.29% | -0.19% | -0.10% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.06% | — |
Volatility
BKMS vs. FUMB - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BKMS | FUMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.20% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 0.53% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.25% | 0.76% | +0.49% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 1.25% | 1.16% | +0.09% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 1.25% | 1.77% | -0.52% |
BKMS vs. FUMB - Expense Ratio Comparison
BKMS has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than FUMB's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
BKMS vs. FUMB - Dividend Comparison
BKMS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.11%, less than FUMB's 2.80% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BKMS BNY Mellon Municipal Short Duration ETF | 1.11% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FUMB First Trust Ultra Short Duration Municipal ETF | 2.80% | 2.90% | 2.86% | 2.24% | 1.02% | 0.43% | 0.94% | 1.74% | 0.15% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BKMS and FUMB have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BKMS is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BKMS is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for FUMB.
FUMB has the higher dividend yield at 2.80%, compared with 1.11% for BKMS.
They also come from different issuers: BNY Mellon and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for BKMS and 0.45% for FUMB.
Find the right allocation for BKMS and FUMB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer