BKMS vs. ERX
BKMS (BNY Mellon Municipal Short Duration ETF) and ERX (Direxion Daily Energy Bull 2X Shares) are both exchange-traded funds - BKMS is a Municipal Bonds fund actively managed by BNY Mellon, while ERX is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the Energy Select Sector Index (300%). BKMS is actively managed, while ERX is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.28, they often move in opposite directions. BKMS charges 0.35%/yr vs 1.09%/yr for ERX.
Performance
BKMS vs. ERX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
BKMS
- 1D
- 0.07%
- 1M
- 0.64%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ERX
- 1D
- -3.19%
- 1M
- -18.65%
- YTD
- 39.90%
- 6M
- 41.93%
- 1Y
- 53.28%
- 3Y*
- 18.69%
- 5Y*
- 24.28%
- 10Y*
- -10.44%
BKMS vs. ERX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
BKMS BNY Mellon Municipal Short Duration ETF | 0.79% |
ERX Direxion Daily Energy Bull 2X Shares | 29.06% |
Correlation
The correlation between BKMS and ERX is -0.28, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 12, 2026 | -0.28 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BKMS vs. ERX — Risk / Return Rank
BKMS
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
ERX
BKMS vs. ERX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNY Mellon Municipal Short Duration ETF (BKMS) and Direxion Daily Energy Bull 2X Shares (ERX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BKMS | ERX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.21 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.88 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 5.39 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BKMS vs. ERX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BKMS drawdown since its inception was -0.87%, smaller than the maximum ERX drawdown of -99.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BKMS and ERX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BKMS | ERX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -0.87% | -99.54% | +98.67% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -28.49% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -42.34% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -46.90% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -98.59% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -92.94% | +92.94% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.26% | -67.10% | +66.84% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 9.92% | — |
Volatility
BKMS vs. ERX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BKMS | ERX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 14.55% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 34.19% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.22% | 41.83% | -40.61% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 1.22% | 51.93% | -50.71% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 1.22% | 69.08% | -67.86% |
BKMS vs. ERX - Expense Ratio Comparison
BKMS has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than ERX's 1.09% expense ratio.
Dividends
BKMS vs. ERX - Dividend Comparison
BKMS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.11%, less than ERX's 1.82% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BKMS BNY Mellon Municipal Short Duration ETF | 1.11% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ERX Direxion Daily Energy Bull 2X Shares | 1.82% | 2.54% | 2.94% | 3.17% | 2.23% | 2.16% | 2.35% | 1.56% | 3.10% | 0.85% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BKMS and ERX have a correlation of -0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BKMS is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BKMS is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 1.09% for ERX.
ERX has the higher dividend yield at 1.82%, compared with 1.11% for BKMS.
BKMS is categorized as Municipal Bonds, while ERX is Leveraged Equities. They also come from different issuers: BNY Mellon and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for BKMS and 1.09% for ERX.
Find the right allocation for BKMS and ERX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer