BKMC vs. FEMG
BKMC (BNY Mellon US Mid Cap Core Equity ETF) and FEMG (Fidelity Enhanced Mid Cap Growth ETF) are both Mid Cap Growth Equities funds. BKMC is passively managed, while FEMG is actively managed. A 0.71 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BKMC charges 0.04%/yr vs 0.23%/yr for FEMG.
Performance
BKMC vs. FEMG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
BKMC
- 1D
- 0.40%
- 1M
- 3.22%
- YTD
- 11.69%
- 6M
- 12.55%
- 1Y
- 24.74%
- 3Y*
- 16.22%
- 5Y*
- 8.06%
- 10Y*
- —
FEMG
- 1D
- -0.34%
- 1M
- 4.84%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BKMC vs. FEMG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
BKMC BNY Mellon US Mid Cap Core Equity ETF | 3.16% |
FEMG Fidelity Enhanced Mid Cap Growth ETF | 5.12% |
Correlation
The correlation between BKMC and FEMG is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 1, 2026 | 0.71 |
BKMC vs. FEMG - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
BKMC
FEMG
Industrials
Technology
Financial Services
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Energy
Utilities
Industrials
BKMC
FEMG
Technology
BKMC
FEMG
Financial Services
BKMC
FEMG
Healthcare
BKMC
FEMG
Consumer Cyclical
BKMC
FEMG
Real Estate
BKMC
FEMG
Basic Materials
BKMC
FEMG
Consumer Defensive
BKMC
FEMG
Communication Services
BKMC
FEMG
Energy
BKMC
FEMG
Utilities
BKMC
FEMG
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BKMC vs. FEMG — Risk / Return Rank
BKMC
FEMG
BKMC vs. FEMG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNY Mellon US Mid Cap Core Equity ETF (BKMC) and Fidelity Enhanced Mid Cap Growth ETF (FEMG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BKMC | FEMG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.64 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.40 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.52 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.72 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BKMC | FEMG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.64 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.43 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.83 | 6.56 | -5.73 |
Drawdowns
BKMC vs. FEMG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BKMC drawdown since its inception was -25.02%, which is greater than FEMG's maximum drawdown of -3.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BKMC and FEMG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BKMC | FEMG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.02% | -3.29% | -21.73% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.82% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.68% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.02% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.34% | +0.34% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.55% | -0.95% | -5.60% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.55% | — | — |
Volatility
BKMC vs. FEMG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BKMC | FEMG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.20% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.97% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.12% | 12.04% | +3.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.77% | 12.04% | +6.73% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.16% | 12.04% | +7.12% |
BKMC vs. FEMG - Expense Ratio Comparison
BKMC has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than FEMG's 0.23% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
BKMC vs. FEMG - Dividend Comparison
BKMC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.38%, while FEMG has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BKMC BNY Mellon US Mid Cap Core Equity ETF | 1.38% | 1.35% | 1.54% | 1.38% | 1.63% | 1.15% | 0.86% |
FEMG Fidelity Enhanced Mid Cap Growth ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BKMC and FEMG have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BKMC is cheaper at 0.04% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BKMC is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.23% for FEMG.
BKMC has the higher dividend yield at 1.38%, compared with 0.00% for FEMG.
They also come from different issuers: BNY Mellon and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for BKMC and 0.23% for FEMG.
Find the right allocation for BKMC and FEMG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer