BKMC vs. BKSE
BKMC (BNY Mellon US Mid Cap Core Equity ETF) and BKSE (BNY Mellon US Small Cap Core Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BKMC is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Morningstar US Mid Cap Index, while BKSE is a Small Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Morningstar US Small Cap Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, BKMC returned 8.06%/yr vs 7.21%/yr for BKSE. Their correlation of 0.95 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.04% expense ratio.
Performance
BKMC vs. BKSE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BKMC achieves a 11.69% return, which is significantly lower than BKSE's 14.30% return.
BKMC
- 1D
- 0.40%
- 1M
- 3.22%
- YTD
- 11.69%
- 6M
- 12.55%
- 1Y
- 24.74%
- 3Y*
- 16.22%
- 5Y*
- 8.06%
- 10Y*
- —
BKSE
- 1D
- 0.34%
- 1M
- 3.07%
- YTD
- 14.30%
- 6M
- 15.09%
- 1Y
- 36.43%
- 3Y*
- 17.83%
- 5Y*
- 7.21%
- 10Y*
- —
BKMC vs. BKSE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BKMC BNY Mellon US Mid Cap Core Equity ETF | 11.69% | 8.74% | 13.78% | 17.50% | -16.03% | 23.83% | 45.93% |
BKSE BNY Mellon US Small Cap Core Equity ETF | 14.30% | 13.09% | 9.56% | 22.37% | -18.44% | 16.18% | 55.56% |
Correlation
The correlation between BKMC and BKSE is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 13, 2020 | 0.95 |
The correlation between BKMC and BKSE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.
BKMC vs. BKSE - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
BKMC
BKSE
Industrials
Technology
Financial Services
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Energy
Utilities
Industrials
BKMC
BKSE
Technology
BKMC
BKSE
Financial Services
BKMC
BKSE
Healthcare
BKMC
BKSE
Consumer Cyclical
BKMC
BKSE
Real Estate
BKMC
BKSE
Basic Materials
BKMC
BKSE
Consumer Defensive
BKMC
BKSE
Communication Services
BKMC
BKSE
Energy
BKMC
BKSE
Utilities
BKMC
BKSE
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BKMC vs. BKSE — Risk / Return Rank
BKMC
BKSE
BKMC vs. BKSE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNY Mellon US Mid Cap Core Equity ETF (BKMC) and BNY Mellon US Small Cap Core Equity ETF (BKSE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BKMC | BKSE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.64 | 2.08 | -0.44 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.40 | 2.98 | -0.58 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.35 | -0.06 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.52 | 3.84 | -1.32 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.72 | 13.40 | -3.68 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BKMC | BKSE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.64 | 2.08 | -0.44 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.43 | 0.34 | +0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.83 | 0.74 | +0.09 |
Drawdowns
BKMC vs. BKSE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BKMC drawdown since its inception was -25.02%, smaller than the maximum BKSE drawdown of -29.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BKMC and BKSE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BKMC | BKSE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.02% | -29.08% | +4.06% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.82% | -9.40% | -0.42% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.68% | -26.76% | +3.08% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.02% | -29.08% | +4.06% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.55% | -9.06% | +2.51% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.55% | 2.69% | -0.14% |
Volatility
BKMC vs. BKSE - Volatility Comparison
BNY Mellon US Mid Cap Core Equity ETF (BKMC) and BNY Mellon US Small Cap Core Equity ETF (BKSE) have volatilities of 4.20% and 4.36%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BKMC | BKSE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.20% | 4.36% | -0.16% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.97% | 11.92% | -0.95% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.12% | 17.59% | -2.47% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.77% | 21.43% | -2.66% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.16% | 22.30% | -3.14% |
BKMC vs. BKSE - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both BKMC and BKSE have an expense ratio of 0.04%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
BKMC vs. BKSE - Dividend Comparison
BKMC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.38%, more than BKSE's 1.15% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BKMC BNY Mellon US Mid Cap Core Equity ETF | 1.38% | 1.35% | 1.54% | 1.38% | 1.63% | 1.15% | 0.86% |
BKSE BNY Mellon US Small Cap Core Equity ETF | 1.15% | 1.26% | 1.55% | 1.38% | 1.50% | 1.17% | 0.82% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.96, BKMC and BKSE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
BKSE has higher volatility (4.36%) compared to BKMC (4.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BKMC dropped -25.02% vs BKSE's -29.08%.
On 5-year performance, BKMC leads with 8.06% vs 7.21% for BKSE. Both ETFs have the same 0.04% expense ratio. On volatility, BKMC has been the lower-risk option at 4.20%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, BKMC has performed better with a 8.06% return vs 7.21%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BKMC and BKSE have the same expense ratio: 0.04% per year.
BKMC has the higher dividend yield at 1.38%, compared with 1.15% for BKSE.
BKMC is categorized as Mid Cap Growth Equities, while BKSE is Small Cap Growth Equities. BKMC tracks Morningstar US Mid Cap Index, while BKSE tracks Morningstar US Small Cap Index.
BKSE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.08 vs 1.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BKMC and BKSE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer